Karlnet
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Karlnet] Re: Amps

To: <blair@wmwisp.net>,"Karlnet Mailing List" <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Subject: RE: [Karlnet] Re: Amps
From: "Andy Henckel" <ahenckel@transaria.com>
Reply-to: Karlnet Mailing List <karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
Date: Thu, 20 May 2004 14:38:19 -0600
List-post: <mailto:karlnet@WISPNotes.com>
I agree as well.. they all have their problems. 

Going forward, we are only using high powered cards in all newly deployed 
systems. 

 -----Original Message-----
From:   karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com [mailto:karlnet-bounces@WISPNotes.com]  
On Behalf Of Blair Davis
Sent:   Thursday, May 20, 2004 2:29 PM
To:     karlnet@WISPNotes.com
Subject:        [Karlnet] Re: Amps

I'd have to disagree.  I have a bunch of YDI amps that have given me 
nothing but trouble.  We have tried YDI, Hyperlink, Teletronics and RF 
Linx.  We have removed all the YDI amps from the system.

I have 2 Teletronics amps that have been removed from the system.  They 
each have lost their receive gain.

I now have 3 Hyperlink amps that quit when they get too hot. 

Of the rest, they are about 50/50 between RF Linx and Hyperlink.

I have never had a RF Linx amp fail.

We use top mounted amps on any location that we would not want to climb 
in bad weather.  If it is safe to climb in wind/rain/snow and their is 
power available we mount our radio gear on top.  At this time we no 
longer use POE for access points.

As to a high power KN-50, why not just put a 200mW card in it?  If you 
run max antenna gain, (24db) and a 200mW, (23.5db) card you will be just 
under legal power (47.5db US) for a PtP link.


Blair Davis
West Michigan Wireless ISP
269-686-8648



_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet


_______________________________________________
Karlnet mailing list
Karlnet@WISPNotes.com
http://lists.wispnotes.com/mailman/listinfo/karlnet

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>