Propagation
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [Propagation] Critical vs. Maximum Usable Frequency map

To: "'propagation'" <propagation@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [Propagation] Critical vs. Maximum Usable Frequency map
From: "David Ackrill" <dave.g0dja@tiscali.co.uk>
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2004 21:59:48 -0000
List-post: <mailto:propagation@contesting.com>

-----Original Message-----
>Tomas:

>How does the MUF map predict availablity of a DX path
>for 80 Meter QSOs (which was the original question),
>or for 160 Meters?


Be fair, the original question was something like "why are there lots of
signals when the propagation prediction software says the band is dead".

Maybe I misunderstood?  Do you mean that there was lots of DX (over, say,
3000kM) signals on the band in question?

If so, I apologise, I misunderstood what you were saying.  Maybe if you can
say what countries were being heard, at what time, and where you/your friend
are located, then someone with more knowledge of propagation on LF can help.

De dave (G0DJA)

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.764 / Virus Database: 511 - Release Date: 15/09/2004
 

_______________________________________________
Propagation mailing list
Propagation@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>