| To: | propagation@contesting.com |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [Propagation] SnapMAX |
| From: | Carl K9LA <k9la@gte.net> |
| Date: | Wed, 13 Oct 2004 18:54:43 -0500 |
| List-post: | <mailto:propagation@contesting.com> |
|
Hi Crawford, It's been a while since we last chatted - I believe the last time was when a gentleman said your book "The Friendly Ionosphere" supported his theory of NVIS propagation on 10m. I'm curious - how far does SnapMAX say a multi-hop signal can go on 160m in the dark ionosphere before it's at the noise floor of a typical receiver (around -135dBm)? I've gone through this with Proplab (using 1000w and verticals on both ends in a winter month), and the distance is around 12,000km. Of course this distance limit would really be somewhat less because I did not include noise in the picture. I'd be interested to see how your SnapMAX calculation compares to a rigorous ray trace. I figure you can do this with SnapMAX quicker than I can. Carl K9LA _______________________________________________ Propagation mailing list Propagation@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/propagation |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [Propagation] SIDC Daily Solar & Geo Report, Thomas Giella KN4LF |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [Propagation] 160 m maybe, but NOT SnapMAX ....., Crawford MacKeand |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [Propagation] 160m Propagation Prediction, Crawford MacKeand |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [Propagation] 160 m maybe, but NOT SnapMAX ....., Crawford MacKeand |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |