RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] What next?

To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] What next?
From: Jeff Singer" <js@reallybig.com (Jeff Singer)
Date: Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:46:21 -0500
It's incredible how some folks always seem to get involved with courtroom
scenarios! Please, let's not have that discussion on his account, okay?

Really guys, it's not that juicy. The man has a little vertical antenna and
a neighbor with a problem, that's all. He asked for some advice, and I
believe he received some useful information, based mostly on common
experiences of this wise old group. Let's not try to frighten the pajamas
off him!

No one is ruling in anyone's favor here. He was looking for support and
advice for his immediate situation, not horror stories. They're just not
that helpful.

73 de Jeff K2KV

> -----Original Message-----
> From: owner-rfi@contesting.com [mailto:owner-rfi@contesting.com]On
> Behalf Of EDWARDS, EDDIE J
> Sent: Tuesday, February 01, 2000 5:17 PM
> To: 'K4SB'; 'rfi'
> Subject: RE: [RFI] What next?
>
>
>
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From:       K4SB [SMTP:k4sb@mindspring.com]
> > > Out of frustration she may then take it to court if she has more money
> > than
> > > sense.  She will lose of coarse, but it'll cost you too!  So what I'm
> > trying
> > Don't think so. I believe in these cases you are entitled to
> > recover full costs of defending yourself.
>       [Ed-K0iL]  Hi Ed; I'm not a lawyer, but I don't think you're
> "entitled" to recover full costs in every state or every case.  It may
> depend on how the judge rules in the case.  I know of a ham who found
> himself in court over RFI.  I have a first-hand e-mail from him telling me
> the story.  The neighbor really wanted to get rid of the ham's towers and
> the RFI, but they only sued over the RFI issue.  The judge was very
> sympathetic to the neighbor, not the ham!  But he also had to follow the
> law, and federal pre-emption forced him to rule in favor of the
> ham.  After
> he won, the ham's lawyer said it would cost as much to sue to recover his
> costs than he had already spent.  Like I said, maybe that varies
> from state
> to state, I don't know.
>
>       73,
>       de ed -K0iL
>
>
> --
> FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/rfi-faq.html
> Submissions:              rfi@contesting.com
> Administrative requests:  rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com
> Questions:                owner-rfi@contesting.com
>


--
FAQ on WWW:               http://www.contesting.com/rfi-faq.html
Submissions:              rfi@contesting.com
Administrative requests:  rfi-REQUEST@contesting.com
Questions:                owner-rfi@contesting.com


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>