RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] K-Com vs. Bytemark/Amidon Phone Filters?

To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] K-Com vs. Bytemark/Amidon Phone Filters?
From: wb3fsr@comcast.net (Peter D. Vouvounas)
Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 16:24:00 -0400
Eric,

The gal behind the table also said they guarantee 100%!!!

Hmmm

PeterV [REN] WB3FSR

-----Original Message-----
From: rfi-admin@contesting.com [mailto:rfi-admin@contesting.com]On
Behalf Of wd3q@starpower.net
Sent: Monday, May 20, 2002 15:15
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: [RFI] K-Com vs. Bytemark/Amidon Phone Filters?


At the Hamvention this past weekend, the Bytemark/Amidon guys were there
with their phone filters.

The are physicallyt larger than the K-COM filters, but there was no
technical information available, other than that theie units were for
specific 'services', implying that they use type 73 ferrites (vs 43 they
claim K-COM uses) for the ham bands.

Can anyone verify the performance difference, if any, between these
manufacturers?

Thanks in advance,

Eric W3DQ
Washington,



_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi



<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>