To: | <rfi@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | [RFI] K-Com vs. Bytemark/Amidon Phone Filters? |
From: | wd3q@starpower.net (wd3q@starpower.net) |
Date: | Mon, 20 May 2002 16:14:39 -0400 |
At the Hamvention this past weekend, the Bytemark/Amidon guys were there with their phone filters. The are physicallyt larger than the K-COM filters, but there was no technical information available, other than that theie units were for specific 'services', implying that they use type 73 ferrites (vs 43 they claim K-COM uses) for the ham bands. Can anyone verify the performance difference, if any, between these manufacturers? Thanks in advance, Eric W3DQ Washington, |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | [RFI] K-COM vs. Amidon/Bytemark Phone Filters?, wd3q@starpower.net |
---|---|
Next by Date: | [RFI] K-Com vs. Bytemark/Amidon Phone Filters?, Peter D. Vouvounas |
Previous by Thread: | [RFI] K-COM vs. Amidon/Bytemark Phone Filters?, wd3q@starpower.net |
Next by Thread: | [RFI] K-Com vs. Bytemark/Amidon Phone Filters?, Peter D. Vouvounas |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |