| To: | <rfi@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [RFI] K-COM vs. Amidon/Bytemark Phone Filters? |
| From: | wd3q@starpower.net (wd3q@starpower.net) |
| Date: | Mon, 20 May 2002 12:46:13 -0400 |
At the Hamvention this past weekend, the Bytemark guys were there with their phone filters. The are physicallyt larger than the K-COM filters, but there was no technical information available, other than that theie units were for specific 'services', implying that they use type 73 ferrites (vs 43 they claim K-COM uses) for the ham bands. Can anyone verify the performance difference, if any, between these manufacturers? Thanks in advance, Eric W3DQ Washington, DC |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | [RFI] RE: RFI digest, Vol 1 #114 - 1 msg, Mike @ RFI Services |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | [RFI] K-Com vs. Bytemark/Amidon Phone Filters?, wd3q@starpower.net |
| Previous by Thread: | [RFI] RE: RFI digest, Vol 1 #114 - 1 msg, Mike @ RFI Services |
| Next by Thread: | [RFI] K-Com vs. Bytemark/Amidon Phone Filters?, wd3q@starpower.net |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |