[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] RE: No More Nice Guy? (was BPL video FAQs)

To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: [RFI] RE: No More Nice Guy? (was BPL video FAQs)
From: W4EF at dellroy.com (Michael Tope)
Date: Mon Aug 11 13:24:44 2003
Many of the industry comments are filled with technical
hubris. In some cases it involves exaggeration, in other
cases it involves outright falsehoods. It would not surprise
me if this pattern of truth bending extended to their
claims about lack of interference problems.

73 de Mike, W4EF...............................

----- Original Message -----
From: "EDWARDS, EDDIE J" <eedwards@oppd.com>
To: <rfi@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 9:26 AM
Subject: [RFI] RE: No More Nice Guy? (was BPL video FAQs)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Cortland Richmond
> One of the arguments made by BPL proponents is that they have received
> no
> complaints.
> ===
> This may've already been pointed out, but I think one proponent said
> "their members" (i.e. UTC members) haven't reported any BPL interference
> complaints to the UPLC organization.  In "Clintonese" that means
> utilities who are UTC members have not reported RFI complaints to the
> UPLC.  No kidding?  You would expect that, wouldn't you?  Why would they
> report RFI complaints?  Even if there were one or two in the tiny areas
> where tests were being conducted, it would be detrimental for them to
> report such complaints now that they have so much invested in the
> outcome.
> 73,
>  de ed -K0iL
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>