[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] BPL reply comments

To: "Hare,Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org>, "Richard Karlquist" <richard@karlquist.com>, kilo.mike@gte.net, "RFI Reflector" <rfi@contesting.com>, "Michael Tope" <W4EF@dellroy.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] BPL reply comments
From: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: ka5s@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 25 Aug 2003 8:37:27 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Jumping in... BPL seems to be presently treated as a carrier current system
for sections 15.107 (NO conducted current limit above 1.705 MHz) and 15.109
(radiated limits).  BPL claims (hah) to be an unintentional radiator.


> [Original Message]
> From: Michael Tope <W4EF@dellroy.com>
> I am curious, Ed. Is it correct that BPL is classified by the FCC as an
> unintentional emitter? I seem to recall reading somewhere in part 15
> that PLC systems are considered unintentional emitters, but it was
> never absolutely clear to me that HF BPL systems should receive the
> same consideration.

RFI mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>