[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] Crossed Signals article

To: editor@tampatrib.com
Subject: [RFI] Crossed Signals article
From: "Cortland Richmond" <ka5s@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: ka5s@earthlink.net
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2004 12:27:50 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
A well written article. You are maintaining the perspective one expects a 
newspaper to have. However, perhaps you should take sides.  The power companies 
say they observe the FCC interference limit. This may be so. (Field tests have 
show instances where those appear to have been exceeded.)  Too, some firms have 
already asked the FCC to increase the allowed level. But even if they met the 
present limit, that would not make the resulting interference acceptable.  
Radio interference levels which might have sometimes been put up with, on 
isolated frequencies, here and there, are not acceptable all the time, 
everywhere, and at every frequency. 

An analogy might be local noise ordinances. Most towns have an ordinance 
forbidding noise after,9:00 PM or so. That shuts down the neighborhood garage 
bands so we can get some sleep.  But suppose every neighbor had a garage band? 
Wouldn't the all-day cacophony be too much to bear? Legal does not mean 

The FCC's public database shows 976 current Florida licenses for low-VHF 
spectrum between 30 and 50 MHz. This too is spectrum the electric companies 
want to send over power lines.  A reasonable analysis of interference potential 
shows substantial risk to users of these systems, who include the Florida State 
Patrol, other state government users, water and gas agencies, school boards and 
private businesses. The City of Tampa is one, and two Tampa hospitals, and the 
Hillsborough County school system.

And the Hurricane Net, on the Amateur Radio bands? Won't Florida need that?  It 
sounds like electric companies don't think so.

Cortland Richmond
Why Wait? Move to EarthLink.
RFI mailing list

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [RFI] Crossed Signals article, Cortland Richmond <=