RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

[RFI] re:FCC okays BPL proposal

To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: [RFI] re:FCC okays BPL proposal
From: Michael Dinkelman <mwdink@eskimo.com>
Date: Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:14:58 -0800
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>


Seeing how this is something we may need to deal with,
some calm and coherent preparation may be in order.

1) I plan on monitoring my utilities plans (there
   are conflicting reports on whether they are
   interested in BPL or not).

2) If the worst happens, per part 15, I plan on
   being a complainer at any hint of BPL interference.
   (They've been responsive in the past and my local
   lineman who lives up the street is a Ham.)
   Towards that end, what would be the best way to document
   a case? I feel it might be wise to make some baseline
   recordings of my current HF band noise levels.
   Anybody have any recommendations towards this
   end - specifically something that can pass muster
   if challenged? I don't have a spectrum analyzer
   or access to one. Would audio recordings (MP3 files)
   be adequate?

3) Any other ideas out there?

4) What are the Hams doing in the the trial areas
which I have heard virtually nothing about (other
than the Amperion trial)? Are the field trials that
tightly controlled?

73
dink, n7wa
Kent, WA






--------------------------------------------------------------- The world's top contesters battle it out in Finland! THE OFFICIAL FILM of WRTC 2002 now on professional DVD and VHS! http://home1.pacific.net.sg/~jamesb/ ---------------------------------------------------------------

_______________________________________________
CQ-Contest mailing list
CQ-Contest@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/cq-contest

_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
  • [RFI] re:FCC okays BPL proposal, Michael Dinkelman <=