It has nothing to do with "jamming"!
It has to do with forcing an open and honest and public
demonstration of the facts -- something the massive bucks
behind BPL is invested in preventing.
There would be no jamming -- just "normal" operation of
both the BPL and Ham ops -- and everyone will then be able
to see who is telling the truth and who is lying for profit.
doc
Bill Turner wrote:
On Fri, 16 Apr 2004 16:27:38 -0400, doc wrote:
Everything Completely Legal, base KW & 500W+ mobile stations
located within a mile of the Meeting just happen to get a 10x multiplier!
_________________________________________________________
Even if it is "legal", I wish this jammer mentality would disappear. If
we hams get into a pissing contest with the BPL folks, we will lose, I
assure you.
If it comes down to a catfight kind of squabble, the side with the most
money and widest audience will win. We need to concentrate on the FCC
requirement that there be no - repeat no - harmful interference to any
existing service, including us. That is our best hope.
--
Bill, W6WRT
QSLs via LoTW
--
Thanks! & 73, doc kd4e
West Central Florida
Drake, Heathkit, Kenwood, TenTec, Yaesu
Radio Life: http://www.gospelcom.net/twr/
Linux-Incompatible hardware is defective!
USA Pres. Election 2004: http://www.rnc.org/
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|