RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] Single-point grounding

To: "Roger (K8RI)" <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>, rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] Single-point grounding
From: "Dale Svetanoff" <svetanoff@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: svetanoff@earthlink.net
Date: Sun, 1 Jul 2012 21:06:58 -0500
List-post: <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Roger,

Just a few remarks:

1.  YES, all I/O cables between the house and outside world need to pass
thru a common grounding panel.  The fact that I have 2 such panels, at
opposite ends of the house, does not seem to be an issue with respect to
lightning.  I think that is because both panels are securely bonded to that
perimeter ground wire system.  The point here is that no I/O cable should
be unprotected.

2.  Since you have a large, distributed system, have you considered using
either isolation transformers/baluns between parts of the house or other
buildings?  An alternative would be to go wireless with wi-fi.  Either
method would get around the long conductive path issue.  I think the wi-fi
would be a better way to go, as baluns or transformers could arc over
internally.  

3.  I totally agree with your last paragraph.  You can be assured that
"ground" will not stay at 0 volts during a lightning strike.  It will
bounce, a lot, and what matters is that everything must bounce together. 
Remember, if there is just 1 ohm of resistance/impedance in the strike
path, and allowing for the strike currents to divide into 2 or more paths,
even a modest 20,000 amp flow in some part of the ground system will put
that ground at 20,000 volts above and below 0 volts reference.  (Lightning
strike current follows a decaying sine waveform once it is coupled onto
conductors.)

I had the privilege of working alongside one of the aerospace industry's
top lightning experts when I was at Rockwell Collins.  I showed him the
damaged antennas and cables from my tower after the big blast I took in
2008, and his estimate was that my system had taken a heavier than average
hit - probably 40 to 60 kA.  A "normal" strike is 20 to 40 kA, and
super-cell blasts can exceeed 100 kA.  

73, Dale
WA9ENA   




> [Original Message]
> From: Roger (K8RI) <k8ri@rogerhalstead.com>
> To: <rfi@contesting.com>
> Date: 7/1/2012 6:07:58
> Subject: Re: [RFI] Single-point grounding
>
> On 7/1/2012 3:52 PM, Jim Brown wrote:
> > On 7/1/2012 7:28 AM, Pete Smith N4ZR wrote:
> >> I'm not sure exactly where I should post this, but suspect that this
> >> group probably has more relevant expertise than most, so please bear
> >> with me.
> >>
> >> In the last year, I have had two expensive episodes.  In both cases, my
> >> transceiver's RS-232 transceiver was fried during a lightning storm,
and
> >> several knowledgeable people suggested a difference in chassis
potential
> >> between computer and transceiver as the reason.  Their prescription for
> >> avoiding a repetition was simple - connect the chassis of all of the
> >> units to a single-point ground.
>
> Like Jim, I'm a strong proponent of the Single Point Ground (SPG) but 
> there are additional factors to be taken into account when other 
> services are taken into account, even if they all enter through a common 
> point. Three major ones are telephone, cable, and TV.
> Even if they enter at the same point the telephone may connect to a TV, 
> Satellite receiver, and computers.  Computers may be tied into the 
> common point ground, but if they have a network, or cable connection, it 
> likely follows a different path.   TV antennas be they satellite, cable, 
> or plain off the air (OTA) antennas "should" enter the house through the 
> same grounding panel as the ham equipment.
>
> The problem is with coax to the TV, the telephone lines, network cables, 
> and coax for the cable service are usually of different lengths and 
> follow different paths.  The TV may be in a different part of the house, 
> or on a different floor.  The coax to the TV may branch to many rooms, 
> and network cables may do likewise.  I have three that go to my shop 
> that has its own electrical feed. Even a ground that traverses the 
> periphery of the house can have a huge voltage difference between one 
> corner of the house and another. It's that these lines don't just carry 
> the voltage from a nearby lightning strike into the house, they act like 
> an antenna themselves, or if you will, the windings in a transformer and 
> the voltage is directly induced into them, *INSIDE* the home.
>
> BTW the antenna ground system connects to the grounds for both the house 
> and shop, forming a large network of ground cables and rods of over 600 
> feet of bare #2 cadwelded(TM) to 32 or 33 8' ground rods.
>
> These voltage differences on ground are not normally a problem by 
> themselves, but when we also have network and coax connections running 
> direct between them, the voltages between say a network cable and 
> chassis ground can be thousands of volts.  The wiring in older homes can 
> be a real crap shoot as who knows where the stuff runs or how long the 
> run.  It's common to find the lights in one room and the outlets in 
> another sharing a common circuit.  It saves a circuit, and saves money 
> from the permit.  But as homes age these circuits seem to take on a life 
> of their one.  I've mentioned it before, but I started tracing a circuit 
> while doing some rewiring. The circuit runs from the breaker panel, up 
> through the wall and through the attic to a junction box (where wires 
> are simply twisted together using wire nuts) Now the wiring *may* run 
> from outlet to outlet, outlet to junction box to outlet, for the room or 
> it may be a combination. Then it runs over to another room where one 
> Romex Runs down through the wall to several outlets and then "through 
> the wall to the bathroom. From there it goes to a common switch box 
> which feeds fans and lights, but from that box there is also a run to 
> the outlets AND from one outlet the wires go through the wall to feed 
> the outlets on the South side of my den. So this single circuit goes to 
> at least 4 different rooms through at least 3 (or more) junction boxes 
> and directly from one room to another through walls at least twice.    
> Now all the chassis are connected to the SPG, but the AC lines in the 
> Den are 3 circuits of much different lengths. So the chassis are all 
> common (more or less), but the electrical feeds may be many thousands of 
> volts different.  The same is true of the network and USB cables.
>
> I started rewiring to add circuits and to equalize circuit lengths. It 
> would take probably 4 more circuits, cost $300 to $400 with $80 of that 
> being to the township for permits. First will be to get the 3 circuits 
> into the den the same length and follow the same route. Following 
> backwards will be to isolate the bathroom into a single circuit.  Then 
> the living room and back bedrooms will require an additional circuit so 
> the standard outlets and lights will cross between them and no wires 
> from either into the bathroom.
>
> There is no 100% guarantee but I believe the more I do the more it puts 
> the odds in my favor.  The idea of the ground (and equal length 
> circuits) is not to keep everything at ground potential, but to make 
> sure (or as sure as can be) that everything going into  a piece of 
> equipment is at the same potential at the same time.
>
> 73
>
> Roger (K8RI)
>
> > I'm a strong advocate of that, but there's more to it.  The fundamental
> > problem is that we have many pieces of equipment that have unbalanced
> > connections between them, and that are connected to ground at different
> > points.  A lightning event induces current in those ground wires, with a
> > resulting IR drop in the grounding conductor. The DIFFERENCE between the
> > voltage on one chassis and another appears on the low voltage connection
> > between the equipment and smokes it.  The difference between the power
> > outlet and our shack ground can also smoke equipment,
> >
> > Exactly the same thing happens with leakage current on power wiring,
> > causing hum and buzz to be added to unbalanced wiring between
> > equipment.  The solution is quite simple, and applies equally to your
> > problem.  1) Bond chassis to chassis from all interconnected equipment
> > using short, fat copper. I've generally recommended either braid
> > stripped from transmitting coax or #10 stranded copper. 2) Get power
> > from all interconnected equipment from outlets that are in the same
> > electrical backbox, or that share the same green wire, or that have
> > their green wires bonded together.  3) Bond from the collection of
> > equipment chassis to the common point where your antennas are grounded,
> > again by short fat copper.  4) Follow NEC requirements for bonding
> > carefully. This includes bonding EVERYTHING  to the power system ground
> > by short, fat copper -- your station grounds, CATV, satellite, telco,
> > cold water (if conductive), building structural steel, and lightning
> > rods, if any.
> >
> >> My solution - which I'm asking people to critique - was to fabricate an
> >> L-shaped, roughly 3x5 foot ground bus made from 3/4" copper tubing,
> >> which I mounted on the back of my L-shaped operating desk. All joints
> >> are silver-soldered. I then connected each of the affected units to the
> >> bus with very short and heavy stranded wire, and connected the end of
> >> the bus to my grounded shack entry panel (in a double-hung window).
> >>
> >> The DC resistance of the ground bus is very low, but the length
> >> approximates a quarter wave on 10 meters,
> > IEEE research says that the energy in lightning is very broadly centered
> > around 1 MHz, with lots of energy at least a decade of frequency above
> > and below.  At these frequencies, impedance is dominated by inductance,
> > not resistance. Thus short is better.
> >
> >> and with the units connected
> >> near the ends of the bus, I wonder if I'm feeling a false sense of
> >> security about the likely behavior of the bus during a nearby lightning
> >> event.
> > What you've done is very good, but I would ADD the short fat bonding
> > between interconnected equipment. Contrary to popular myth about "ground
> > loops," the added bond REDUCES noise and the ightning voltages between
> > equipment that causes destructive failures.
> >
> >> Would I be better off (or no better) running heavy conductors
> >> from each unit to the entry panel, even if they would have to be
> >> similarly long? Or should I just give up and plan on disconnecting the
> >> RS-232 connection whenever weather approaches?
> > We MUST connect every AC outlet to the entry panel -- it's the "green
> > wire" -- and it MUST be bonded to the chassis of all connected equipment
> > that is required to have a 3-wire plug.  The only AC-connected equipment
> > that does not require that bond are products that are double insulated
> > to prevent the possibility of shock. This equipment will have a 2-wire
> > plug.  Lots of wall warts and computer power supplies have this
> > exemption.  BUT -- the chassis of equipment powered by these power
> > supplies still needs to be bonded.
> >
> > 73, Jim K9YC
> > _______________________________________________
> > RFI mailing list
> > RFI@contesting.com
> > http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >
> >
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi


_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>