On Wed, 12 Feb 2014 10:53:51 -0600 Ed Douglass <efdouglass37@gmail.com>
writes:
> David Robbins' argument is interesting but it takes the focus away,
> it
> seems to me, from what should be the primary point of our efforts.
> The
> point is that the FCC's job in the first instance is to regulate
> the
> manufacturers and importers of electronic equipment so that the
> equipment
> does not cause interference to licensed users of the radio spectrum.
> If
> such regulation had been enforced, then we amateurs would not need
> to be
> approaching our neighbors about their RFI-generating appliances.
>
> For the RFI-generating equipment already in the country, then we
> will have
> to approach our neighbors and hope we have the FCC's backing if our
> efforts
> fail.
>
> For the long haul, however, we need to use ourselves and our ARRL to
> get
> the FCC to enforce its rules (and tighten them, where necessary).
>
> 73 de Ed, AA9OZ
>
Yes!! That would be the thing to do. What's the best approach
to get the FCC back on track?
I would like to think the ARRL would help with that by
making a concerted effort to get it done. And the
ARRL will need a lot of support (including money) from us!!
73,
Charlie, N0TT
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|