To: | rfi@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC.. |
From: | Roger D Johnson <n1rj@roadrunner.com> |
Date: | Thu, 03 Apr 2014 12:01:58 -0400 |
List-post: | <rfi@contesting.com">mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
If I recall correctly, it was a 21 mHz IF that caused the problem for hams on
15m. Later, TV IFs
were moved into the 40 mHz range. 73, Roger On 4/3/2014 11:35 AM, Dale J. wrote: The 15 Mc. IF was in the TV's and notorious for receiving ham signals, but it was our fault anyway. 73 Dale, k9vuj _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC.., Dale J. |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC.., Dale J. |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC.., Dale J. |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] ARRL to FCC.., Dale J. |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |