The FCC can and does have teeth any time it chooses. It has issued fines again
and again in support of whatever agenda exists
What partisan politics reason would the FCC have for not taking action on
high-powered lighting controllers operating at 58 dB above the limits, handed
to them on a silver platter?
________________________________________
From: RFI [rfi-bounces@contesting.com] on behalf of qrv@kd4e.com [qrv@kd4e.com]
Sent: Saturday, August 01, 2015 9:49 AM
To: rfi@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RFI] ARRL Board of Directors resolution related to FCC
enforcement of radio-interference issues
You missed the qualifier: IF they first remove the partisan
politics and crony capitalist bias & function as proper
servants of the people - then talk about money - otherwise
it's like feeding wild bears in a campground.
Meanwhile, as I noted, we have some other tools with which
to show them what's really important to us and to do some
of their job for them.
David KD4E
> On Sat,8/1/2015 12:47 AM, Roger (K8RI) wrote:
>> I agree, the less govt involvement the better.
>
> Time for a re-think. That means toothless FCC. THAT'S a HUGE part of our
> problem, and it's how we got here.
>
> 73, Jim K9YC
--
*David* KD4E
ARES-EC Bulloch County, Nevils, Georgia USA
Safe & Secure Search Engine: duckduckgo.com
Android for Hams: groups.yahoo.com/group/hamdroid
Creative Tech: groups.yahoo.com/group/ham-macguyver
Raspi Alternative: groups.yahoo.com/group/beagleboneblack/
Restored to design-spec at Heaven's gate 1Cor15:22
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|