I'm not saying we should not expect government agencies
to do the jobs we pay them to do - but where there's a
history of wrong priorities (and sometimes worse) the
wrong answer is more funding.
We trust agencies to do right, yes?
Well, there's been no evidence in modern history of a
Federal agency making decisions based on something other
than an even-handed fact-based evaluation - free of
external partisan meddling?
Our executive branch is free of selfish crony-capitalist
lobbying?
Really?
A billion dollar corporation is going to stand silent
while the FCC either forces their product to be removed
or re-engineered at great expense?
In the automotive industry the recall process is driven
by fear of litigation and public anger when people are
injured - little threat of either exists in RFI cases.
Years ago in a masters of public administration program
one course was titled "Bureaucracy". The book was huge.
When I was about half way through I said to the prof
"Things can't be that bad - nothing would ever get done."
Then I worked for the government for a couple of years
and discovered that it was much worse.
Juat sayin' ... David KD4E
> The FCC can and does have teeth any time it chooses. It has issued
> fines again and again in support of whatever agenda exists
>
> What partisan politics reason would the FCC have for not taking
> action on high-powered lighting controllers operating at 58 dB above
> the limits, handed to them on a silver platter?
--
*David* KD4E
ARES-EC Bulloch County, Nevils, Georgia USA
Safe & Secure Search Engine: duckduckgo.com
Android for Hams: groups.yahoo.com/group/hamdroid
Creative Tech: groups.yahoo.com/group/ham-macguyver
Raspi Alternative: groups.yahoo.com/group/beagleboneblack/
Restored to design-spec at Heaven's gate 1Cor15:22
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|