Part 18 exclusively addresses ISM equipment: Industrial, Scientific, and
Medical. As far as lighting is concerned, Part 18 specifically addresses
ONLY "*RF* LIGHTING" which is the only lighting option present in Part 18.
Certainly a florescent tube excited to emit light on 60-Hz is NOT "*RF*
LIGHTING". I fail to comprehend how and why a florescent ballast would
come under Part 18. Florescent lighting is not "*RF* LIGHTING". Possibly
a florescent tube excited to emit light by a Tesla Coil or a close-by AM
broadcast tower (KOB AM in the North Valley of Albuquerque) would/might
come under Part 18, but not standard home florescent lighting.
Dave - WØLEV
On Fri, Aug 2, 2019 at 5:35 PM Cortland Richmond <ka5s@earthlink.net> wrote:
> FWIW department; a local Batteries Plus has four kinds of solid state
> ballasts for sale; two have no FCC markings, one says it's for
> commercial use only (in VERY small print) and the one that references
> Part 18 says "FCC Part 18A". NO progress since 2014.
> (
> http://www.arrl.org/files/file/About%20ARRL/Committee%20Reports/2014/July/Doc_20b.pdf
> )
>
> Cortland -- KA5S, semiretired
> (Contract work via Belcan LLC)
>
> > One problem with the lighting industry is that they, in general, are
> > unaware of the FCC requirements placed on their segment. Nearly all the
> > lighting projects I've done indicate the lighting segment is unaware of
> any
> > requirements placed on them by the FCC. Once made aware, they usually
> > continue to honor FCC.
> >
> > Only a strong FCC can do anything about China. Not complaining. Just
> > stating reality.
> >
> > Dave - WØLEV
> > EMC Design & Test, LLC
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 31, 2019 at 3:19 PM Mike Pansini <kf5yub@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> This light quest; I don't understand why I'm the only person actually
> doing
> >> something instead of complaining. There's the problem, people complain
> but
> >> don't actually investigate, instead complain with no resolution. I will
> >> re-iterate, everything electrical causes RFI, even the SUN. HF black
> outs
> >> caused by solar … SUN.
> >> Just because something is written doesn't mean it's fact or true. Get
> >> involved and ask the right people, stop complaining.
> >> 73,
> >> Mike KF5YUB
> >>
> >>
> >> On Tue, Jul 30, 2019 at 11:00 AM <rfi-request@contesting.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Send RFI mailing list submissions to
> >>> rfi@contesting.com
> >>>
> >>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>> rfi-request@contesting.com
> >>>
> >>> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>> rfi-owner@contesting.com
> >>>
> >>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >>> than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Today's Topics:
> >>>
> >>> 1. Re: RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19 (Dave Cole)
> >>> 2. Re: RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19 (David Eckhardt)
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 1
> >>> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 10:39:02 -0700
> >>> From: Dave Cole <dave@nk7z.net>
> >>> To: rfi@contesting.com
> >>> Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19
> >>> Message-ID: <ee82547a-f40a-0d83-84db-7339035d017d@nk7z.net>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> >>>
> >>> Mike,
> >>> I can't seem to locate any reference to FCC Part 15 at the link
> >>> provided, can you point me at the FCC certified info on their web site
> >>> please?
> >>>
> >>> 73, and thanks,
> >>> Dave (NK7Z)
> >>> https://www.nk7z.net
> >>> ARRL Technical Specialist
> >>> ARRL Volunteer Examiner
> >>> ARRL Asst. Director, NW Division, Technical Resources
> >>>
> >>> On 7/29/19 8:37 AM, Mike Pansini wrote:
> >>>> Greetings,
> >>>> To direstly answer the LED growing lights, find a company that is FCC
> >>>> compliant and has proof of FCC as well as all the safety RoHS etc...
> >> Ask
> >>>> about their return policy.
> >>>> After reading a thread from FCC about LED grow lights, I began to
> >>> question
> >>>> yard and street lights as well. I talked with the FCC regarding the
> >> "grow
> >>>> LEDs" causing interference. That's a fuzzy situation is about the
> >> answer
> >>> I
> >>>> got. Clearly, I was told, if something is FCC certified, either a
> >>> sticker,
> >>>> pamphlet, other FCC paperwork is required by the FCC to accompany the
> >>>> product. I think it's a lot of money to certify something and not
> >> display
> >>>> proof, be ware!! I tried a couple "FCC certified" LEDs only to find
> >>>> problems with one manufacture stating "FCC" but no proof of FCC, and
> >>> broken
> >>>> electrical parts, or the product is not in compliant with FCC. They
> did
> >>>> cause about a S-5, and S-3 QRN and that's not good for hearing weak
> >>>> signals.
> >>>> Look up *MORSEN* *Lighting*,* they are FCC certified*, and supply that
> >>>> proof in the paperwork supplied with their products. They do cause
> >> slight
> >>>> QRN but may be an S-1 or less I found. I hope this helps you and your
> >>> wife
> >>>> have fun with your hobbies at the same time. I am growing about 50
> Rare
> >>>> Hungarian Paprika Peppers, some two Habaneros and two Serrano peppers.
> >> I
> >>>> grow bare root trees (Arbor Day Foundation), getting them ready for
> >>>> outdoors...Golden Raintrees, Crape Mertyle bushes, Nanking Cherry
> >> bushes
> >>>> (finally made Nanking Cherry Jelly and syrup), Bodark tree, Passion
> >>> fruit,
> >>>> (enclosed porch) Rubber plants, Ponytail Palm tree.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.morsenled.com/ <https://www.morsenled.com/>
> >>>>
> >>>> 73,
> >>>> Mike KF5YUB
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:00 AM <rfi-request@contesting.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Send RFI mailing list submissions to
> >>>>> rfi@contesting.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>>>> rfi-request@contesting.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>>>> rfi-owner@contesting.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >>>>> than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Today's Topics:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. LED Grow Lights (Kim Elmore)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Message: 1
> >>>>> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 21:09:50 -0500
> >>>>> From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
> >>>>> To: "rfi@contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com>
> >>>>> Subject: [RFI] LED Grow Lights
> >>>>> Message-ID: <e76a5508-0cc1-f454-7061-c00bb023b8a2@sbcglobal.net>
> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My Wife enjoys starting garden plants form seed indoors and, up until
> >> a
> >>>>> few days ago, used a 175W metal halide lamp for the purpose. It used
> >> and
> >>>>> electronic ballast that, sadly, has bitten the dust. A new ballast is
> >> a
> >>>>> bit over half the cost of a much brighter and efficient LED grow
> >> light.
> >>>>> But I'm concerned about RFI since it almost certainly uses a
> switching
> >>>>> supply. Does anyone have any direct knowledge of quiet LED grow
> lights
> >>>>> in the "1000W" category. (I don't know where that term comes from,
> but
> >>>>> these tend to be rated at ~165 W power usage.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kim N5OP
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM,
> >> PP
> >>>>> SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
> >> in
> >>>>> practice, there is." //??? Attributed to many people; it???s so true
> >>> that
> >>>>> it
> >>>>> doesn???t matter who said it./
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Subject: Digest Footer
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> RFI mailing list
> >>>>> RFI@contesting.com
> >>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> End of RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19
> >>>>> ************************************
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> RFI mailing list
> >>>> RFI@contesting.com
> >>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Message: 2
> >>> Date: Mon, 29 Jul 2019 18:26:08 +0000
> >>> From: David Eckhardt <davearea51a@gmail.com>
> >>> To: Mike Pansini <kf5yub@gmail.com>
> >>> Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [RFI] RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19
> >>> Message-ID:
> >>> <
> >>> CAODdWWEtkjN5U6UjdgGSe23Ci1ZF-dUS07qfmtNWt8qMXhc+cQ@mail.gmail.com>
> >>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> >>>
> >>> Just a reminder of practices from China:
> >>>
> >>> Just because the product may carry the proper 'graffiti' on the
> >> regulatory
> >>> label (required for all Home and Small Office electronics - FCC Class
> B),
> >>> does not mean any attention has been paid to design, testing and
> >> approvals
> >>> for EMC and Safely. I have tested and rejected many, if not most,
> >>> products (mostly from China and even some from the US) that adhere to
> >> this
> >>> scenario. Printing and applying labels is cheap: "How many labels do
> >> you
> >>> need?". Designing, testing, and approving products for EMC and Safety
> is
> >>> expensive (between $3K TO $30K on up, depending on complexity). Safety
> >> is
> >>> not necessarily required in the US. However, to justify the CE mark
> (N O
> >>> T standing for China Export ! ! ! ! ! ! ), both safety and EMC must be
> >>> conducted by an approved body. Most of us know this. However, because
> >> of
> >>> the example set by the Chinese, many legitimate US suppliers are
> taking a
> >>> similar approach weighing cost against risk and reputation. Most get
> >> away
> >>> with the practice. A very few do not.
> >>>
> >>> *Bottom Line:* Don't take the presence of the the proper 'graffiti' on
> >> the
> >>> regulatory label as gospel. Request the documentation to justify what
> is
> >> on
> >>> the label. Read the report in total to verify it isn't assembled from
> >>> multiple and non-related equipment and reports (another common practice
> >>> from China).
> >>>
> >>> Been there. Done that. Experienced all of the above (and then some).
> >>>
> >>> Dave - W?LEV
> >>> EMC Design & Test, LLC
> >>>
> >>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 3:37 PM Mike Pansini <kf5yub@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Greetings,
> >>>> To direstly answer the LED growing lights, find a company that is FCC
> >>>> compliant and has proof of FCC as well as all the safety RoHS etc...
> >> Ask
> >>>> about their return policy.
> >>>> After reading a thread from FCC about LED grow lights, I began to
> >>> question
> >>>> yard and street lights as well. I talked with the FCC regarding the
> >> "grow
> >>>> LEDs" causing interference. That's a fuzzy situation is about the
> >> answer
> >>> I
> >>>> got. Clearly, I was told, if something is FCC certified, either a
> >>> sticker,
> >>>> pamphlet, other FCC paperwork is required by the FCC to accompany the
> >>>> product. I think it's a lot of money to certify something and not
> >> display
> >>>> proof, be ware!! I tried a couple "FCC certified" LEDs only to find
> >>>> problems with one manufacture stating "FCC" but no proof of FCC, and
> >>> broken
> >>>> electrical parts, or the product is not in compliant with FCC. They
> did
> >>>> cause about a S-5, and S-3 QRN and that's not good for hearing weak
> >>>> signals.
> >>>> Look up *MORSEN* *Lighting*,* they are FCC certified*, and supply that
> >>>> proof in the paperwork supplied with their products. They do cause
> >> slight
> >>>> QRN but may be an S-1 or less I found. I hope this helps you and your
> >>> wife
> >>>> have fun with your hobbies at the same time. I am growing about 50
> Rare
> >>>> Hungarian Paprika Peppers, some two Habaneros and two Serrano peppers.
> >> I
> >>>> grow bare root trees (Arbor Day Foundation), getting them ready for
> >>>> outdoors...Golden Raintrees, Crape Mertyle bushes, Nanking Cherry
> >> bushes
> >>>> (finally made Nanking Cherry Jelly and syrup), Bodark tree, Passion
> >>> fruit,
> >>>> (enclosed porch) Rubber plants, Ponytail Palm tree.
> >>>>
> >>>> https://www.morsenled.com/ <https://www.morsenled.com/>
> >>>>
> >>>> 73,
> >>>> Mike KF5YUB
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> On Sun, Jul 28, 2019 at 11:00 AM <rfi-request@contesting.com> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Send RFI mailing list submissions to
> >>>>> rfi@contesting.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
> >>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>>>> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
> >>>>> rfi-request@contesting.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can reach the person managing the list at
> >>>>> rfi-owner@contesting.com
> >>>>>
> >>>>> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
> >>>>> than "Re: Contents of RFI digest..."
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Today's Topics:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 1. LED Grow Lights (Kim Elmore)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> Message: 1
> >>>>> Date: Sat, 27 Jul 2019 21:09:50 -0500
> >>>>> From: Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>
> >>>>> To: "rfi@contesting.com" <rfi@contesting.com>
> >>>>> Subject: [RFI] LED Grow Lights
> >>>>> Message-ID: <e76a5508-0cc1-f454-7061-c00bb023b8a2@sbcglobal.net>
> >>>>> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
> >>>>>
> >>>>> My Wife enjoys starting garden plants form seed indoors and, up
> >> until a
> >>>>> few days ago, used a 175W metal halide lamp for the purpose. It used
> >>> and
> >>>>> electronic ballast that, sadly, has bitten the dust. A new ballast
> >> is a
> >>>>> bit over half the cost of a much brighter and efficient LED grow
> >> light.
> >>>>> But I'm concerned about RFI since it almost certainly uses a
> >> switching
> >>>>> supply. Does anyone have any direct knowledge of quiet LED grow
> >> lights
> >>>>> in the "1000W" category. (I don't know where that term comes from,
> >> but
> >>>>> these tend to be rated at ~165 W power usage.)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kim N5OP
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> --
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology, CCM,
> >> PP
> >>>>> SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)
> >>>>>
> >>>>> /"In theory there is no difference between theory and practice. But,
> >> in
> >>>>> practice, there is." //??? Attributed to many people; it???s so true
> >>> that
> >>>>> it
> >>>>> doesn???t matter who said it./
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Subject: Digest Footer
> >>>>>
> >>>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>>> RFI mailing list
> >>>>> RFI@contesting.com
> >>>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------
> >>>>>
> >>>>> End of RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 19
> >>>>> ************************************
> >>>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> RFI mailing list
> >>>> RFI@contesting.com
> >>>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>>
> >>> *Dave - W?LEV*
> >>> *Just Let Darwin Work*
> >>> *Just Think*
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> Subject: Digest Footer
> >>>
> >>> _______________________________________________
> >>> RFI mailing list
> >>> RFI@contesting.com
> >>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> ------------------------------
> >>>
> >>> End of RFI Digest, Vol 198, Issue 21
> >>> ************************************
> >>>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> RFI mailing list
> >> RFI@contesting.com
> >> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
> >>
> >
> _______________________________________________
> RFI mailing list
> RFI@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
>
--
*Dave - WØLEV*
*Just Let Darwin Work*
*Just Think*
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
|