RFI
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd

To: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd
From: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Date: Thu, 25 Mar 2021 02:48:34 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
Very neat to learn – I will keep everyone posted.

73,
Joe kk0sd

From: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 24, 2021 1:01 PM
To: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>
Cc: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com>; Kim Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>; 
Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd

Hi Gary,

Thanks for the update, and I also went crazy today and ran more tests using my 
version of your un-tuned shielded loop.  I always enjoy learning, and your 
situation is interesting and I have never used a shielded un-tuned loop based 
on the design you are using so this has been interesting.

Today I installed a full size 1/4 wave 20 meter vertical over my 55 buried 
ground radial field.  I set up a transmitter 290 feet from this antenna (used 
my NanoVNA as the remote signal source on 14 MHz).  The signal measures S6.1 on 
my TS-180s transceiver connected to my full size 1/4 wave 20 meter vertical and 
if I switch to the un-tuned loop using it in my shack with my TS-180s I can 
still hear the signal just fine but the S meter is not moving (S0) but it's 
easy to hear and it nulls in the correct direction.  I can also easily hear 
this remote signal using my portable receiver outside my house with my version 
of your un-tuned loop (not very strong but I can easily hear it), and if I walk 
down my street even further away from the signal source I can still easily hear 
it and null it.  While the sensitivity of your un-tuned loop is not good 
compared with most of the radio direction finding antennas we all use (tuned 
loops, etc) as we have all mentioned, it behaves really well on 14 MHz 
(sensitivity a bit better than a simple 9 inch un-tuned loop, and it has very 
nice balance).

This goes right back to the issue Kim and I were struggling with.  The signal 
is so strong on 14 MHz at your location based on your recording (peaking 20 dB 
over S9) that it's hard to believe you can't hear it with your un-tuned loop.

Lots of great comments from everyone, and hope in the future you undertake some 
of the other direction finding antenna projects folks have mentioned, but based 
on the data you have supplied and based on my testing, it sure looks like your 
un-tuned loop should be hearing the noise while standing on your property or 
your antenna is generating it's own noise or there is a very local source 
(something sitting very, very close to your vertical that only your vertical 
can hear, etc.), or your portable receiver is not working right, or your 
un-tuned loop is broken, etc.

I can't wait to find out what the root cause of your problem is, as we will all 
learn a lot.

Have a great work week, and I now have to go put my 68 foot base loaded 
vertical that I use on 160 meters back up that I took down for todays 
experiments.

73,
Don (wd8dsb)


On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 6:20 PM Gary 
<gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>> wrote:
Don,

                I hope to hook the loop to my FT-847 this weekend as it is on 
my list of tests. It is a little more involved to do.  I don’t hear much in 
general with antennas in my basement shack…I probably have more faith in the 
loop than my portable shortwave radio. I am glad to hear the loop works okay on 
the shortwave bands. I use a ferrite antenna for the AM band when I hear noise 
there. It still amazes me I do not hear anything on  the AM broadcast band. The 
good news is  I did hear the noise when connecting my portable shortwave to my 
main antenna…

                I have also arranged to borrow an FT-818 for portable chasing 
this weekend. I hear the noise on 6 meters (but not 2 meters) so I am hoping 
with the portable rig and a 6 meter beam I can at least get pointed in the 
right direction.

Thank You Everyone for the Help!

73,
Gary “Joe” kk0sd

From: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com<mailto:wd8dsb@gmail.com>>
Sent: Tuesday, March 23, 2021 4:34 PM
To: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com<mailto:mike@rfiservices.com>>
Cc: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>>; Kim 
Elmore <cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net<mailto:cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>>; Rfi List 
<rfi@contesting.com<mailto:rfi@contesting.com>>
Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd

Hi Gary and gang,

Let me go back and clarify my previous statement about your shielded loop as I 
just did more testing on higher frequencies.  Down in the AM broadcast band 
your loop based on my using RG-58 is deaf compared with a simple 9 inch single 
turn loop, but on higher frequencies its sensitivity greatly improves (I even 
thought the sheild on my RG-58 might be inadequate down in the AM broadcast 
band so I added aluminum foil as a secondary shield and that had no impact.  Up 
on 10  and 15 MHz I would say the gain of my version of your shielded loop is 
much closer to that of my simple 9 inch diameter loop but I did not dig out my 
test gear to see how close they really were, but I did like how the shielded 
loop was behaving on the higher frequencies.  I'm not sure what any of the 
numbers mean because there is no attention paid to impedance matching, etc.

I went back and looked at your original video and on 20 meters the RFI is very 
strong, and I can't believe you can't hear it with your shielded loop based on 
some signal strength measurements I did today (maybe your portable radio is 
deaf????).  I can just barely hear WWV on 10 MHz using my version of your 
shielded loop when WWV is running about S7 on my HF rig that's using an antenna 
that's resonate on 10 MHz (during the afternoon).

I really am curious what you would hear on 20 meters if you just connect your 
shielded loop to your HF rig.  If it's easy to do it would be great if you 
could do this with your shielded loop outside (maybe just connect the shielded 
loop to your coax that's currently going to your vertical.

Sorry I have probably gotten you way off track.
Don (wd8dsb)

On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 3:11 PM Don Kirk 
<wd8dsb@gmail.com<mailto:wd8dsb@gmail.com>> wrote:
Hi Mike, Gary, and gang,

Well after seeing Garys shielded un-tuned loop, I watched the video on how to 
build that loop.  I just built one almost identical to his loop but used RG-58 
coax since that's what I had on hand.  I also spent 10 seconds building a 
simple 1 turn 9 inch loop (no form, just free standing) for comparisons which 
is even smaller than Garys loop, and I can tell you there is no comparison.  
Without doing any impedance matching, the 9 inch un-tuned single turn loop I 
built has a gain that is approximately 23 dB greater than Garys loop when 
tested in the AM broadcast band and it still exhibits nice nulls which comes as 
no surprise.  My single turn non shielded loop just has about 6 inches of 
twisted wire (the same wire that forms the loop) to form the feedline to it, 
and then I just used a 3 foot piece of 50 ohm coax to connect it to my 
receiver.  I used the same 3 foot piece of coax to connect the shielded 
un-tuned loop to the receiver.  While my un-tuned 9 inch loop might not be as 
well balanced (one null might be deeper than the opposite null), it makes one 
fine DF antenna in a pinch.  Also if Gary needs more gain he can just make the 
loop I made bigger in diameter.  It really just takes seconds to make this 
antenna (much less than a minute).

I now fully understand why Gary can't hear his noise, as his un-tuned shielded 
loop has very poor sensitivity based on my trying to copy the design.  While I 
normally use preamps with my DF loops, Garys RFI is so strong that I'm pretty 
darn sure he can make a simple one turn loop to figure out what possible 
directions the signal is coming from.  Something I have done in the past is to 
use a cardboard box as the antenna form as it does not have to be round.  Need 
to figure out what directions the signal is coming from before leaving his 
property if at all possible.

Just my opinion, and I will try and post some comparison videos but they will 
not be pretty as I'm buried in other tasks.

73,
Don (wd8dsb)



On Tue, Mar 23, 2021 at 8:33 AM Mike Martin 
<mike@rfiservices.com<mailto:mike@rfiservices.com>> wrote:
Remember in his shack he has a very good radio and a very good antenna which 
together increased sensitivity and allow him to hear much further away. when he 
goes outside with a portable and a smaller antenna he doesn't have the 
sensitivity he had inside there for he may have to travel a lot further before 
he's able to receive it.
Be safe,
Mike
Get BlueMail for Android<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
On Mar 22, 2021, at 11:37 PM, Gary 
<gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>> wrote:

Kim,

 I hear it on the portable when connected to the vertical antenna, but will 
undertake an antenna substitution experiment this weekend.

Keep the suggestions coming!

73 and Thanks,
Gary "Joe", kk0sd



-----Original Message-----
From: RFI 
<rfi-bounces+gary_mayfield=hotmail.com<http://hotmail.com>@contesting.com<http://contesting.com>>
 On Behalf Of Kim Elmore
Sent: Monday, March 22, 2021 4:44 PM
To: Don Kirk <wd8dsb@gmail.com<mailto:wd8dsb@gmail.com>>
Cc: Rfi List <rfi@contesting.com<mailto:rfi@contesting.com>>
Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd

That’s a great idea, too! I once ran into an interference problem that was 
inherent to the antenna, but only under certain conditions. It didn’t sound 
like Gary’s but I pulled a lot of hair out fixing that one. I’m simply 
suspicious that he hears NOTHING with his portable rx so I’m after eliminating 
anything inherent to his station. Standing by his vertical with his portable rx 
is a great idea.

73,

Kim N5OP

"People that make music together cannot be enemies, at least as long as the 
music lasts." -- Paul Hindemith

 On Mar 22, 2021, at 2:24 PM, Don Kirk 
<wd8dsb@gmail.com<mailto:wd8dsb@gmail.com>> wrote:

 
 Hi Dave,

 I still recommend tuned and untuned loops to folks on an almost daily basis 
but they definitely don’t shed as much light on the situation as a 
unidirectional antenna does.  It would be nice to see what your shielded 
untuned loop design is.

 The beauty of the portable flag which is unidirectional is that you typically 
can walk right to the source (no guessing which direction the signal is coming 
from).  I still pack 7 antennas when I go on a RFI case, and this includes 3 
tuned HF loops, but I have found that I typically don’t use bidirectional loops 
anymore (unless I’m trying to be more stealth) as the portable flag saves me an 
enormous amount of time.  Also in heavily congested areas (like downtown 
Indianapolis) having the unidirectional HF antenna is priceless as it unmasks 
noise that’s mixing from other sources that are in the opposite direction, etc. 
 Yesterday I worked on a case (more of a country setting) where I had 2 
different bad poles that were only 0.14 miles apart plus a 3rd RFI source 
generating spikes every 1 KHz within the same area and having the 
unidirectional HF antenna helped me locate all 3 sources in a matter of minutes 
(way under an hour).

 You can never have enough antennas in your direction finding bag of tricks but 
after using a unidirectional HF antenna like the portable flag for direction 
finding I can’t imagine not using one.  It typically takes me seconds to tell 
which direction the signal is without the need of triangulation, etc.  
Traditional triangulation has almost become a thing of the past for me.

 I also have been helping a ham that has the MFJ unit (the one with a beam and 
the one with a dipole) and while it has helped him, it has an odd 
characteristic that makes the meter jump which causes confusion to him and 
after looking at the schematic I question how they implemented AGC in those 
units.  I’m starting to think AGC in a radio direction finding system is 
typically not desirable.  Manual attenuation is priceless but I don’t want 
anything changing gain automatically.

 Just my opinion from tracking down RFI on an almost continuous basis in 
addition to my day job.

 Please share details on your shielded untuned loop and thanks.

 73,
 Don wd8dsb




 On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 1:22 PM David Eckhardt 
<davearea51a@gmail.com<mailto:davearea51a@gmail.com>> wrote:
 We recently found a faulty lightning 'arrestor' on a pole by using
 both the MFJ device and a small shielded loop (easy home brew
 project) into a battery-powered receiver.  We had two of us in the
 field.  One wielded the MFJ and I had the small (0.5-meter) shielded
 loop fed into the Yaesu VR-500 on 1.830 MHz (160-meters).  We both
 independently found the same source / pole in the field.  The null on
 the shielded loop is extremely sharp and this piece of hardware
 should be in the bag of tricks of anyone sleuthing RFI.  It is a
 powerful tool when coupled to a battery-powered receiver with its
 extremely sharp null (perpendicular to the plane of the loop).  One doesn't 
need something as large as the 'Flag" that was recently published
 in QST and referred to in a previous post in this thread.   Another plus
 for the shielded loop is that in the field, one can tune the receiver
 to the worst-case frequency of the RFI as I did in the related story, above.
 The shielded loop is untuned.  The MFJ relies only on VHF noise.   In some
 cases, an ultrasonic microphone at the focus of a small parabolic or
 spherical reflector is good at finding coronal discharges as well as
 active arcs and discharges.  MFJ also makes that at a reasonable price.

 Our power provider was out the next day to fix the problem.  We even
 gave them the pole number which is a great help to any power provider.

 Dave - WØLEV

 On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 2:28 AM Kim Elmore 
<cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net<mailto:cw_de_n5op@sbcglobal.net>> wrote:


 It's odd that you can't hear it on your portable rx. That made me
 curious: What if this is something internal to your '847? Have you
 tried pulling your '847 and listening on a different receiver using
 the same antenna? If you have, do you still hear the noise? It's a long shot, 
but...

 Kim N5OP

 On 3/21/2021 7:28 PM, Gary wrote:

 Mike,

                  Thanks for the info. I understand locating the
 noise is

 more important than identifying the noise. I am just try to play
 all the angles as I was hoping to work the WPX contest nest
 weekend. I have been walking the neighborhood a good chunk of the
 afternoon, and have not been able to hear the noise on my portable
 shortwave and loop antenna. It is as strong as ever on my home station.

                  I have an MFJ 852 Noise Finder and it seems to
 go crazy

 when broadside to any house. The neighbors on each side of me drive
 the meter full scale.

                  Yep I only want to knock on one door, as I know
 that

 can get dicey. I would rather place a call to a utility, but can’t
 really do either until I know.

                  Keep the suggestions coming!

 Thanks and 73,
 Gary “Joe” kk0sd

 From: Mike Martin <mike@rfiservices.com<mailto:mike@rfiservices.com>>
 Sent: Sunday, March 21, 2021 6:53 PM
 To: Gary <gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>>
 Cc: rfi@contesting.com<mailto:rfi@contesting.com>
 Subject: Re: [RFI] New Interference at kk0sd

 Joe I haven't had time to read all the other input but I can tell
 you it

 is not an arcing source or a sparking source. either one of the two
 would be much broader than what you're reporting. if someone were
 to tell you exactly what it is you really wouldn't be any further
 ahead. You would still have to find which residents or business
 it's in. My suggestion would be to either go mobile or on foot,
 preferably on foot listening to the frequency that you know the
 problem affects. once you locate the residents then go through the
 breaker scenario and locate what the source is. Be 100% certain of
 the structure or home that the problem is in before knocking on the
 door. The last thing you want to do is start guessing. Guessing we'll ruin the 
relationship with your neighbors.

 Be safe,
 Mike k3RFI
 www.rfiservices.com<http://www.rfiservices.com><http://www.rfiservices.com>
 Get BlueMail for Android<http://www.bluemail.me/r?b=16696>
 On Mar 21, 2021, at 2:01 PM, Gary 
<gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:gary_mayfield@hotmail.com><mailto:

 gary_mayfield@hotmail.com<mailto:gary_mayfield@hotmail.com>>> wrote:

 My last problem was tracked down to a neon sign in a neighbors
 garage. I

 had several months of blissful relatively low noise operation, but
 now have a new RFI issue.

 You can see a recording of it here:
 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GKf4P44FXMo

 I have turned all of the breakers in my home off and run the
 radio from

 a battery and the noise remains.

 My neighborhood utilities are all underground.

 There are no solar installations in my neighborhood, and the
 noise is

 there at night anyway...

 The noise is not detectable on the AM broadcast band, but starts
 around

 2 MHz and runs to at least 6 meters.

 It is there 7 days a week 24 hours a day.

 It is not detectable from my pickup when I drive the streets of
 my

 neighborhood (checking both AM broadcast and Shortwave).

 If any one has heard something like this, I would love to hear
 what you

 found.

 Thank You for your input and help!

 73,
 Gary "Joe",  kk0sd

________________________________


 RFI mailing list
 
RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com><mailto:RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>>
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

________________________________

 RFI mailing list
 RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

 --

 Kim Elmore, Ph.D. (Adj. Assoc. Prof., OU School of Meteorology,
 CCM, PP SEL/MEL/Glider, N5OP, 2nd Class Radiotelegraph, GROL)

 /"A great second violinist plays second fiddle to no one." //– Robert C.
 Marsh, Chicago Sun-Times./

________________________________

 RFI mailing list
 RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi



 --
 *Dave - WØLEV*
 *Just Let Darwin Work*

________________________________

 RFI mailing list
 RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
 http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

________________________________

RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi

________________________________

RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com<mailto:RFI@contesting.com>
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
_______________________________________________
RFI mailing list
RFI@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>