To: | RFI Reflector <rfi@contesting.com> |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE" |
From: | KD7JYK DM09 <kd7jyk@earthlink.net> |
Date: | Fri, 20 Jan 2023 15:18:57 -0800 |
List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
On 1/20/2023 14:19, David Eckhardt wrote: Those who are retired don't apply. They knew RF. I can only look at what we are not getting from the present FCC. I'd love to go toe-to-toe with them, and have them attempt to try to explain the validity of past 30 years. Not to get into a pissing contest with them over opinions, rather, explain their own words, in their own documents, and how they may matter, or apply, and why they no longer do, as evidenced by their, and others, own well-documented inaction. Kurt _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE", David Eckhardt |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE", Hare, Ed, W1RFI |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] DEFINITION OF "HARMFUL INTERFERENCE", David Eckhardt |
Next by Thread: | [RFI] SolarEdge HD Wave panel system RFI, damichael--- via RFI |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |