| To: | "Hare, Ed, W1RFI" <w1rfi@arrl.org> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | Re: [RFI] New ARRL Mission statement > Was solar fix |
| From: | Charles Gallo <charlie@thegallos.com> |
| Date: | Mon, 29 Jul 2024 13:11:57 -0400 |
| List-post: | <mailto:rfi@contesting.com> |
In all of this, I see a BIT of good news. I read things like EDN and other trade rags. One of the recurring topics for the last 2 years or so has been design to prevent EMI/RFI, particularly on the power supply end. The chip designers, editors etc are pointing out it is an issue. Now the question is, are the downstream designers taking heed? Don’t know -- 73 de KG2V Charlie _______________________________________________ RFI mailing list RFI@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rfi |
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RFI] New ARRL Mission statement > Was solar fix, Hare, Ed, W1RFI via RFI |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RFI] New ARRL Mission statement > Was solar fix, David Eckhardt |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RFI] New ARRL Mission statement > Was solar fix, Hare, Ed, W1RFI via RFI |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RFI] New ARRL Mission statement > Was solar fix, David Eckhardt |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |