RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] SO1R vs. SO2R Discussion

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] SO1R vs. SO2R Discussion
From: tgstewart@pepco.com (tgstewart@pepco.com)
Date: Tue, 26 Mar 2002 07:55:13 -0500
The only conflict you should be having is on the high bands with tribander 
use assuming you have monoband antennas for 40 and 80.

Put up a dipole for 15 meters at least a 1/2 wavelength off the ground. It 
doesnt get much more efficient than that! 

Use one radio on the tribander and 80 and the other on the 15 "dipole" and 
40 and things get VERY simple indeed! 

If you cant put up a dipole, then you've got a lot more problems than the 
second radio excuse.

Ty K3MM





"Shelby Summerville" <k4ww@arrl.net>
Sent by: rtty-admin@contesting.com
03/25/2002 04:08 PM

 
        To:     "RTTY Reflector" <rtty@contesting.com>
        cc: 
        Subject:        Re: [RTTY] SO1R vs. SO2R Discussion


tgstewart@pepco.com wrote: "My point is you CAN add a second radio at low
power for not a lot of money"

Without room for an efficient second antenna, second radio, regardless of
power, is useless?
C'Ya, Shelby

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty




<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>