RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] ww/rj canadian areas

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: [RTTY] ww/rj canadian areas
From: w1to@adelphia.net (Tom Homewood)
Date: Thu, 3 Oct 2002 10:07:40 -0400
Hi George,

The rules seem pretty clear, VE1 area includes NS and NB for example. WF1B
software puts in the area, i.e. VE3 for Ontario.

Tom, W1TO


----- Original Message -----
From: "George Johnson" <w1zt@attbi.com>
To: "Dirk Desloovere" <d.desloovere@skynet.be>; <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 4:25 PM
Subject: Re: [RTTY] ww/rj canadian areas


> Dirk and all,
> All of my Canadian stations logged sent their province which I logged.
> I submitted that log "as is".  I believe that was the intent of the
> rules.
>
> George .. W1ZT
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Dirk Desloovere" <d.desloovere@skynet.be>
> To: <rtty@contesting.com>
> Sent: Wednesday, October 02, 2002 11:37 AM
> Subject: [RTTY] ww/rj canadian areas
>
>
> Dear,
>
> Now that the rtty sounds are out of my head I am checking my log.
>
> I have been reading the rules again.
>
> The canadian stations have to give a rst + zone + area  but I received
> rst + zone + prov from all the Canadian stations.
>
> I logged the prov. not the area.   In 2001 I logged also the prov.  SC,
> BC, ...... not the areas VE2, VO1, ...  .
>
> The only significant rule change since 2001 is the encouragement of e
> logs.
>
> So I am confused,will the prov.  report exchange count for a good qso ?
>
>
> Regards,
>
> D. DESLOOVERE
> ON4ADZ
>
>
>
> --- StripMime Report -- processed MIME parts ---
> multipart/alternative
>   text/plain (text body -- kept)
>   text/html
> ---
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>