On Tue, 23 Mar 2004 10:29:59 -0600, Charles Morrison wrote:
>I can't speak to this issue directly. However, on the human factors side
>people doing signal detection research stumbled across something that is
>counter intuitive. Is it easier to copy a weak CW signal on a quiet or
>noisy band?
>Many people will say it is easiest to copy CW on a quiet band. However,
>under controlled testing people did a better job of copying a weak CW signal
>in noise than when there was no noise. A demonstration of this on NPR
>nearly blew me away. The played 10 seconds of what to the human ear sounded
>like silence but actually contained a very low level CW signal. When noise
>was added in the CW signal was very obvious. Of course too much noise mask
>the signal entirely.
>I doubt electronic circuits/software work the same as the human brain. But,
>the next time you operate the original digital mode don't cuss any noise for
>it might be help your brain detect a signal that it otherwise might not
>process.
_________________________________________________________
I've noticed a similar effect on CW myself. Often I can copy CW better
with a wide filter instead of a narrow one, even though the apparent
noise is more. Strange.
--
Bill, W6WRT
QSLs via LoTW
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|