RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [RTTY] Contest Happenings - Comments!

To: <Russmill47@aol.com>, <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [RTTY] Contest Happenings - Comments!
From: "Robert Jonsson" <tf3rb@internet.is>
Date: Thu, 27 Jan 2005 21:16:42 -0000
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>

> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
> Behalf Of Russmill47@aol.com
> Sent: 27. januar 2005 20:47
> To: rcooke@g3ldi.freeserve.co.uk; rtty@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Contest Happenings - Comments!
> 
> 
> In a message dated 1/27/2005 2:55:58 P.M. Eastern Standard Time,
> rcooke@g3ldi.freeserve.co.uk writes:
> 
> 1   The macro that issues the serial number is often sent  thus:
> 
> 241241241241  or better  241-241-241. However, it would  be better with
> just a space 241 241 241
> or even a  cr/lf:
> 241
> 241
> 241
> This would help if the UOS did not  work or QRM was bugging.
> 
> 
Problem
If there is qrm/qrn pulse coming to your computer after the first number "2"
then you get a USOS and the rest of your exchange is just garbage and the
serial number never gets to the one receiving. That calls for a repeat my
number and the "more efficient" has gone away. Slowing us down!


If the space was "241 241" then only the first exchange was "2as" and the
rest was OK.

Regards tf3rb robert
> 
> I prefer to use 241-241-241-241 versus 241 241 241 241
> in order to get around the unshift on space (going to letters on a space
> character).
> 
> With 241 241 241 241 241 you should be sending 2 4 1 sp figs  2 4 1
> with 241-241-241-241 you are only sending 2 4 1 - 2 4 1
> 
> which is a little more efficient.
> 
> 73,
> 
> Russ
> WA3FRP
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>