RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

RE: [RTTY] NAQP, the Sprint and RTTY

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: RE: [RTTY] NAQP, the Sprint and RTTY
From: "Don Inbody (AD0K)" <ad0k@inbody.net>
Date: Tue, 8 Feb 2005 13:57:47 -0600
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Well, if everyone is operating on the same bad playing field, then no one
has an advantage, so what good score might be still remains relative to
whoever has the operating skills to pull one out. 


73, Don/ADØK

-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of va3dx@sympatico.ca
Sent: Tuesday, February 08, 2005 1:53 PM
To: Shelby Summerville
Cc: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] NAQP, the Sprint and RTTY

For those of us who are serious or semi-serious , this is not
an option. With 20 mtrs closing earlier, 40 and 80 mtrs are
the only options. I seriously doubt that a 4 hr stint on 80 mtrs
Saturday night will be condusive to a good score.

We all just need to grit our teeth and plug away with the qrm.

Glenn VA3DX

: Re: [RTTY] NAQP, the Sprint and RTTY


> "WI8W" <wi8w@wi8w.org> wrote: "This is a conflict that apparently will be
> around for a few more years because of this rule."
>
> Simple solution, at least for me....as WPX is a 48 hour contest, allowing
> only 30 hours for single op, work all the 40 meter contacts available, the
> first night, and schedule some of my off time, the second night? Life is
> entirely too short, and contesting having far too low a priority, at least
> for me, to even consider a conflict.
> C'Ya, Shelby - K4WW
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>