Bill Coleman wrote:
>
>For domestic QSOs, response rates are pretty good. DX is much more
>spotty. Remember that non-ARRL countries (eg everything but the US and
>Canada) have to go through a much more rigorous process to obtain their
>initial LoTW certificate -- so there are a lot of hams who just haven't
>bothered.
>
It is simply a question of mailing a copy of the license... but you're
right, many hams haven't bothered.
Outside of the USA, there are a few individuals accredited by ARRL as
QSL card checkers. If they were also accredited to verify license
validity for LoTW within their own countries, it would bring a huge
boost to the LoTW database.
--
73 from Ian GM3SEK
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|