All this talk about WAS. Over the years I've never chased WAS and fairly
well gave up adding to my DXCC certificate almost 30 years ago. The only
thing that has renewed my interest in the DXCC certificate is LOTW and
seeing a few new credits available for it. On the WAS side I try to
respond to everyone who needs IA on what ever mode but have never
requested a card from any state. Over the years I have 49 states on
paper cards and if the 50th ever requests a card from me i might apply
for WAS. But, when/if LOTW adds WAS, I just might already have all 50 in
it.
I guess all I really need is my own knowledge of what I've done, besides
a certificate hanging down here in the cave will only be seen by me and
the "cave cat." Believe it or not there is a stack of various
certificates on a shelf down here that are not on the wall (me bad).
73 Larry L in ever so rare IA;-)
W0ETC
On Sun, 31 Jul 2005 10:35:54 -0400 "roofus" <roofus@sbcglobal.net>
writes:
> Hi Shelby and thanks for your input. The problem with WAS in
> contests as
> mentioned on another post that many contesters do not reply to QSL
> cards for
> one reason or another wasting everyone's time and money. On a WAS
> net
> QSLing is a given, even a QSL burro set up to help with postage. If
> (when)
> LOTW is up and running for WAS I'm sure the problem will be solved
> but time
> will tell.
>
> As far as digital vs. RTTY, not much can be done about that now.
>
> Dennis KI8U
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|