Hi Phil,
tks for the QSO in WAEDC. Your operation technics was fine as usual.
The problem you described is a very hard case. But who had invented
exchanges like:
...................DL6JZ DL6JZ de <hiscall> <hiscall>
...................gm es qsl ................ ur 599 006 006 de
<hiscall>
I saw such exchanges with a lot of dots for the first time in the CQWW
RTTY. But last weekend there were tons of such time wasting replies. I
think the programmer of this software (MixW??) published examples for
macros which looks very special but which are not suited for contesting.
I hope this will be a temporary problem only!!
73 + 55
Wolf, DL6JZ
-----Original Message-----
Date: Tue, 15 Nov 2005 10:24:58 +0100
Subject: [RTTY] How about this!
From: "pcooper"
To: rtty@contesting.com
Hi all,
I couldn't find the call when I wrote my WAEDC report, but I have now
found the call that really wound me up during one CQ session.
I was happily working away, and after a TU QRZ?, I get
....IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH.......
which I can't click on, or I get all of that in the call field, so I
have to type it in.
By then, he is calling again, so I reply with a report.
Nothing. I send again, but still nothing.
OK, time to call CQ, and then gues what....
Yup! ....IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH....... is back again. Type
the call in quick and reply. Wait. Wait a bit more, just in case.
Nothing. Re-send the report. Nothing.
Call CQ, get several replies, one of which I work, and as this call
replies, I get ....IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH...IZ8DWH....... all over
again.
If anyone knows IZ8DWH, please advise him that this is NOT a good way to
send your call!
73 all
Phil GU0SUP
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|