RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Two sides

To: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <w4tv@subich.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Two sides
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Reply-to: dezrat@copper.net
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2006 20:34:15 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Sun, 23 Jul 2006 22:46:01 -0400, you wrote:


>To single out SOmR is 
>no different than to single out those who have directional 
>antennas (yagis, quads, log periodics, etc.), a tower taller 
>than 50 feet, or more than one tower. 

------------ REPLY SEPARATOR ------------

Don't forget singling out amplifier owners, hams with buddies to help
them operate and hams with packet/telnet.

Oops... too late. They are already singled out.

The point is and will always be: When a type of operation gives a
significant advantage over other types, it should have it's own class.

SO2R is such an advantage, as very few will disagree. If it was not,
why would anyone go to the trouble?

Now that I think of it, perhaps SO2R should be banned to save people
from wasting their time and money!  (That was a joke, folks).

Bill, W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>