RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot?

To: Chris <frisco.kid@gmail.com>, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] SO2R, small lot?
From: Jerry Flanders <jeflanders@comcast.net>
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2006 15:03:12 +0000
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I recommend you actually measure the RF voltage coming back on the 
"other" coax.

A few years ago I jerry-rigged a RF probe for my DVM and made some 
measurements. I wanted to make sure RF voltages were below likely 
damaging levels in a typical device.

I found my worst-case scenario with stubs was only around 300 
millivolts. Comforting.

The measurements were not hard to do.  I wrote this all up but wasn't 
able to find it for you in a google search a minute ago. It may be in 
the archives of this list.

As a strictly WAG, I would think you will find minimal or no problems 
if you use stubs and 100 w with even a modest separation. The 
polarization difference helps you.

Jerry W4UK

At 04:46 7/25/2006, Chris wrote:
>Since it appears we are short of dead horses, how about a technical question.
>
>If quality filters (and or stubs) are used, what have others
>experienced as minimum speration distance of a beam at 40ft and a
>vertical for SO2R operating at or near 100w?
>
>
>
>Thanks-
>
>Chris
>KB5U

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>