RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] 3B7SP

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] 3B7SP
From: Bill Turner <dezrat@copper.net>
Date: Thu, 14 Jun 2007 07:46:33 -0700
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
ORIGINAL MESSAGE:

On Thu, 14 Jun 2007 09:30:16 -0400, Art Searle W2NRA
<w2nra@optonline.net> wrote:

>I know
>most of us Dxers don't continuous call.  But the number that do seems to be
>on the rise.  I've also heard many a familiar callsigns doing it.  And that
>surprises and disappoints me.  I know; I'm preaching to the choir.

------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------

Continuous calling is annoying, but as long as they are split and not
on the DX's frequency it is at least tolerable, unlike the SWAT team
that sits on the DX frequency and says "not your turn" or some
variation of that. 

In fact, that is so counter-productive I wonder if they are not really
a jammer. I have seen that on SSB where the jammers pretend to be
police and do way more harm than good.

I don't mind someone sending a quick "up up" when the transgressor
doesn't get it, but a long winded TX is way out of line.

Bill W6WRT
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>