RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs

To: "RTTY List" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] single op, 1 radio, 2 recvrs
From: "FireBrick" <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
Reply-to: FireBrick <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Oct 2007 10:50:50 -0500
List-post: <mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I think they should be
On 10/16/2007 10:24:03 AM, Jim McDonald (jim@n7us.net) wrote:
> Are duels still legal?  ;-)
> 
> Jim N7US
> 
> -------- Original Message --------
> 
> 
> ORIGINAL MESSAGE:
> 
> On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 23:10:45 -0400, "Joe Subich, W4TV"
> <w4tv@subich.com> wrote:
> 
> >lly and ethically bankrupt as the first day you
> >wrote it. To separate operators into entry classes based on
> >the efficiency of their operating technique
> 
> ------------ REPLY FOLLOWS ------------
> 
> Technique is part of it, but the main difference is hardware. The
> second radio, remember?
> 
> When hardware gives a marked advantage, such as adding an amplifier or
> a spotting network, a category should be created for that so that
> competition can remain as fair as possible.
> 
> Bill W6WRT
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>