Ed P49X (W0YK),
I followed your recommendation and resubmitted using mycall rather than
051. It will be a busted QSO for me but may help the person that gave me
the 051 report for my QSO #365.
Thanks for the Q's the suggestion.
73 Dick AA5VU
On 2/11/08 12:14 AM, "J. Edward (Ed) Muns" <w0yk@msn.com> wrote:
> Hi, Dick. (First of all, thanks for the four contacts this weekend!)
>
> On your QSO elimination below, this will guarantee the other station gets a
> NIL penalty. I'd recommend you put the QSO data back in and resubmit your
> log. That way, there is a good possibility that Paulo's log checker will
> NOT give the other guy a NIL penalty. It will see that your log has a QSO
> at the proper time but YOU busted the call sign. If the robot won't accept
> a serial number as a "call sign", then put in your own call sign to have a
> valid call sign, but result in the log checker not counting the QSO for you,
> but still validating the QSO for the other station. Especially if you did
> get the serial number properly logged.
>
> In general, is it always best to never eliminate anything from your log.
> The various log checking software, and the log checkers themselves, go to
> great lengths to deal appropriately with these issues. And, to help them do
> their job, they need all of our log data, not just what we think is
> relevant.
>
> 73,
> Ed - P49X (W0YK)
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|