RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

[RTTY] PSK Article in QST

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: [RTTY] PSK Article in QST
From: "k0bx@arrl.net" <k0bx@arrl.net>
Reply-to: k0bx@arrl.net
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:31:17 -0800 (PST)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
It seems that every since a new digital mode came out,
like AMTOR, the writers are always declaring the
"Death of RTTY".  But where is AMTOR, PACKOR, or the
others?  Gone by the wayside and RTTY is more popular
then ever.

Joe K0BX

--- Dennis Gabler <dgabler@prairieinet.net> wrote:

> 
> I think for day to day digital ragchews it probably
> is. For contesting that is another matter.
> 
> 73,
> Dennis W5DG
> 
> Dennis G. - W5DG
> Adel, IA.
> http://www.vortexchaser.com
> 
> 
> >------- Original Message -------
> >From    : Lee Buller[mailto:k0wa@swbell.net]
> >Sent    : 2/20/2008 9:24:23 AM
> >To      : rtty@contesting.com
> >Cc      : 
> >Subject : RE: [RTTY] PSK Article in QST
> >
>  >Did anyone read the article in QST about the PSK
> reader?  A statement was made that PSK is the most
> used or something like 
> that digital mode.  Really?  I find that hard to
> believe!  It is amazing what RTTY does on HF and I
> know the arguments for the 
> new modes, but is PSK-31 and its variants really the
> most used?
> 
> Lee - K0WA
> 
> 
> 
> In our day and age it seems that Common Sense is in
> short supply.  If you don't have any Common Sense -
> get some Common Sense 
> and use it.  If you can't find any Common Sense, ask
> for help from somebody who has some Common Sense. 
> Is Common Sense divine?
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
>  http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>