RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] PropNet Article in QST

To: FireBrick <w9ol@billnjudy.com>, rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] PropNet Article in QST
From: George Henry <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>
Reply-to: George Henry <ka3hsw@earthlink.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:30:50 -0600 (GMT-06:00)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I made mention of your experience over on the QRZ forum, but it would be great 
if you would post it yourself.

George

-----Original Message-----
>From: FireBrick <w9ol@billnjudy.com>
>Sent: Feb 21, 2008 11:08 AM
>To: ka3hsw@earthlink.net
>Subject: Re: [RTTY] PropNet Article in QST
>
>As you know, I was conversing with the 'admin' of PropNet.
>I was unsuccessful in explaining that listening 50hz up/down was not 
>sufficient, as PN would not hear a stations whose zero beat was 100hz away, 
>but AFSK/FSK users would sure hear him.
>Plus I don't think he understood the principal of 'offset'.
>Or he wouldn't insist that he's transmitting on 10139 and that would not cause 
>interference with a station at 10141-2.
>He also wouldn't believe that Euros are relegated to that small portion 
>between 10140 and the commercials which start arough 145
>
>He said he's 'authorized' to run his beacon there.
>And said that I had a 'not in my backyard' attitude.
>
>I gave up talking to him.
>Like talking to a Islamic fundamentalist, either walk away, or shoot em!
>
>Also I sensed that he didn't like digital dxing as he called the operations I 
>mentioned that his beacon was transmitting right smack on top of...'a mess'.
>When I said that if it was a mess, it was becuase your beacon qrmed qsos that 
>went uncompleted and had to be redone.
>
>

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>