RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] some interesting stats

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] some interesting stats
From: "Vladimir Sidorov" <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Reply-to: Vladimir Sidorov <vs_otw@rogers.com>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:19:36 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
There is quite a lot of statistics like that. To make the long story short:

- NA LoTW users have approx. 30% confirmation rate
- non-NA users have approx. 15% confirmation rate.

The best LoTW QSLers are contesters and RTTYers. Obviously the RTTY 
contesters are best of the best...

73,
Vladimir VE3IAE

---



----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Kai Siwiak" <k.siwiak@ieee.org>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Friday, June 27, 2008 2:36 PM
Subject: [RTTY] some interesting stats


>I was very much interested in seeing the statistics that are available at:
>    http://lists.contesting.com/pipermail/rtty/2008-June/025760.html
>
> Can you please tell me if w9ol selectively works LoTW users? Or does he
> just upload his entire log?
>
> www.qsl.net/w9ol/w9ol_lotw.jpg
>
>
> I ask because I've been trying to get a better idea as to the general
> LoTW QSL/QSO rate. The figures available on the LoTW site result in an
> accurate QSL/QSO rate (first you have to double their QSO count: there
> are 2 QSLs per QSL match), and the LoTW data base contains plenty of
> errors.
>
> If you have additional statistics, I'd very much appreciate a copy. What
> I am compiling is:  #QSLs on LoTW vs. #QSOs uploaded to LoTW, as well as
> info whether the entire log is loaded up, or there is some selection
> going on.
>
> Thanks and
> 73,
> Kai, KE4PT
>
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>