RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Jamming takes a giant step backwards

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Jamming takes a giant step backwards
From: "VA3PC - Paul" <va3pc@ciinet.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2008 21:51:31 -0000
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Almost as much fun as the guy IDing himself as KZ8O sending "no corntesters" 
over and over on RTTY.
I'm glad I was only in it to give away a few points, was too busy with the 
honeydoo list this weekend.
73
Paul, VA3PC
----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Bill, W6WRT" <dezrat1242@yahoo.com>
To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Sent: Monday, September 29, 2008 3:06 AM
Subject: [RTTY] Jamming takes a giant step backwards


>I had to laugh Saturday night. Some lid was trying to jam a K4 with an
> MFSk signal. He was following the K4 up the band, jamming him every
> time the K4 stopped to make a call. Fortunately, MFSk is a very poor
> choice for jamming because the frequency hops around and the RTTY is
> easily copied right through it.
>
> I think the FCC should require that all jammers from now on use MFSK.
>
> :-)
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
> !DSPAM:1,48e0463b40564812668778!
>
> 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>