RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] RTTY

To: RTTY <rtty@contesting.com>, "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] RTTY
From: "WS7I" <ws7i@ewarg.org>
Reply-to: ws7i@ewarg.org
Date: Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:33:03 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Perhaps this one will help with your answer out of order folks:

cq ru de ws7i cq

ws7i 599 RI RI KI1G

Macro:

KI1G QSL/UR 599 WA WA WS7I

QSL by him

I wait .012 M/s and fire a macro cq ws7i cq

Seems to pretty much work.



---------- Original Message ----------------------------------
From: "Peter Laws" <plaws0@gmail.com>
Date:  Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:27:51 -0600

>On Mon, Jan 5, 2009 at 03:49, Sartwell <sartwell@verizon.net> wrote:
>
>> never do we sweep around our own back door.  [DID YOU DO EVERYTHING EXACTLY
>> AS THE OTHER OPERATORS MIGHT THINK YOU SHOULD?}  Stop spending all of your
>
>Absolutely!!!  :-)
>
>
>The only thing that really bugs me (tho' not enough to take notes and
>send email) are the few stations that would answer a CQ with their
>exchange.  Confusing at the very least, both to the CQer and to anyone
>trying to S&P on the CQer.
>
>Long exchanges aren't that big a deal, though some were ... well ...
>excessive.
>
>But you know how it is:  the more they operate, the shorter their
>macros will get.
>
>-- 
>Peter Laws | N5UWY | plaws plaws net | Travel by Train!
>
>No Trillion-dollar blank check for crooks!
>_______________________________________________
>RTTY mailing list
>RTTY@contesting.com
>http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>
 




 
                   
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>