RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Any EQSL is invalid

To: "'Jim Hoge'" <knowkode@sbcglobal.net>, <RTTY@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Any EQSL is invalid
From: "Joe Subich, W4TV" <lists@subich.com>
Reply-to: lists@subich.com
Date: Sat, 7 Nov 2009 10:10:11 -0500
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
> Except for topband. The league remains convinced otherwise 
> and cards cannot be field checked.

Unfortunately there were too many instances of 17 meter cards 
being modified and submitted as 160 Meter cards.  The Awards 
Committee remains unconvinced that the field checkers have 
the ability to detect such forgeries.  Although it can be a 
pain, it is nice to know that reasonable care is being used 
to insure some integrity is being maintained on Topband. 

73, 

   ... Joe, W4TV 
 



> -----Original Message-----
> From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com 
> [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On Behalf Of Jim Hoge
> Sent: Saturday, November 07, 2009 9:16 AM
> To: RTTY@contesting.com
> Subject: Re: [RTTY] Any EQSL is invalid
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> 
> <Once upon a time it was assumed that submissions were made 
> in good faith. Fraud was always known to exist; however, it 
> was considered such a small fraction as to be 
> inconsequential. Today you are considered invalid until you 
> PROVE otherwise -- and it's a real shame!>
> 
> Except for topband. The league remains convinced otherwise 
> and cards cannot be field checked.
>  
> Jim W5QM



_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>