RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] FLDigi vs MMTTY?

To: dezrat1242@yahoo.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] FLDigi vs MMTTY?
From: Ed <w3nr@comcast.net>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2010 17:01:02 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On 06/18/2010 03:00 PM, Bill, W6WRT wrote:
> Has anyone done a side-by-side comparison between FLDigi and MMTTY as
> to weak-signal decoding ability?
>
> I have been holding off from FLDigi due to lack of FSK keying ability
> but now I see there is a pseudo-FSK option available. It does require
> a small external circuit but looks easy enough to do.
>
> All comments welcome.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT


A couple of years ago a VE did some side by side and published the 
results on a web page somewhere.

I think if you installed fldigi and did your own testing, you would have 
a better concept.

The vast majority of fldigi users are on AFSK.

Keep in mind with the addition of an inexpensive sound card fldigi will 
also allow SO2R.

Depending on the radio, a seperate PTT is not needed. I have both a 
Omni6 and a FT-450 that use software PTT.

Also keep in mind that fldigi is bridged to N1MM thanks to Rick N2AMG's 
work.

fldigi is solid as a rock in Linux and for the most part M$. OS-X seems 
to be our problem child. But thanks to a couple of very savy users most 
OS-X problems get solved.

The psuedo keying will also allow QSK CW.

73 Thanks

Ed W3NR

list moderator and all around fldigi problem solver.





















_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>