RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Motherboard Recommendation

To: RTTY@contesting.com, pcooper <pcooper@guernsey.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Motherboard Recommendation
From: w4ox <w4ox@bellsouth.net>
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 07:03:05 -0700 (PDT)
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
All,
 
Thanks for the input.  My intent was not to start a controversy.  I simply am 
trying to get back up and running as quickly as possible so as to be able to 
play radio.
 
This was not to imply that I am playing ostrich and am afraid of diving into 
the deep end of the pool.  Rather, my plan is actually for 2 computers.  One is 
for the here and now with XP, the quick and dirty so to speak, to be able to 
get back print RTTY immediately.  I am also planning a second computer with all 
the bells and whistles and Win 7, for which I can tackle the learning curve in 
the background.
 
So, thanks again.
 
73, Doug W4OX

--- On Thu, 7/1/10, pcooper <pcooper@guernsey.net> wrote:


From: pcooper <pcooper@guernsey.net>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Motherboard Recommendation
To: RTTY@contesting.com
Date: Thursday, July 1, 2010, 8:47 AM


Hi all,

Well, looks as though my route has stirred up some replies! Good!

Yes, Bill W6WRT is correct in his statement, that route does work, and doesn't 
cost much to implement.
And Glenn VA3DX is also correct in many ways. Sadly, WF1B is now too outdated 
to continue using, but it can and does do the job of working DX. I used to use 
it with MMTTY as the decoder, which worked really well.

However, if you want to cut down on all that cabling, then the MKII is a great 
way to go. Not only that, it offers many advantages too, such as being able to 
send CW and FSK directly from the built-in memories. It also has a built-in 
soundcard that is designed for radio work, and appears (to me) to be far 
superior to any Soundblaster or on-board cards I have used in the past.

Part of my rationale for going the MKII path was to cut down on the number of 
cables going between the PC and radio, as not only is it neater, but 
significantly reduces the chance of stray RF being picked up from the rig.

My other thought was that sooner or later, COM ports will become a thing of the 
past (spare slots to insert cards are also becoming rare now), and I wanted to 
"future-proof" my setup.

I guess it is all down to personal choice, and Doug W4OX did ask for thoughts 
about what to do, so that was my input!

73 all, and I hope to catch you in the DL-DX this weekend

Phil GU0SUP
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>