RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] Help needed

To: Bruce Beach <language@webpal.org>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] Help needed
From: Kok Chen <chen@mac.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jan 2011 11:26:45 -0800
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
On Jan 15, 2011, at 9:05 AM, Bruce Beach wrote:

> Should we use RTTY or PSK31 (or 63)?

Bruce,

In my opinion, it is not even close -- go with PSK31.  (Bear in mind though -- 
you came to an RTTY reflector to ask :-).

PSK31 has the minimal amounts of "gotchas" that snares beginners.  

BPSK31 is completely independent of sideband (you can use USB and LSB 
interchangeably and no one knows any better).   Cheap.  Simple.

Most PSK31 software today are user friendly.  They present a panoramic "view" 
of the spectrum.  You click on a signal and you start decoding his signal.  And 
when you transmit, you will be "zero beat" automatically on the person.

You won't be at a disadvantage running your new transceiver without an 
amplifier.  Most people you see on PSK31 run perhaps 50 watts.  Quite often you 
see people report using less than 25 watts.

For the same amount of power on a quiet band, PSK31 is better at punching 
through than RTTY.  It is only when there is flutter and bad fading that RTTY 
will finally come out ahead (at that point, RTTY needs more power to get 
through fluttery conditions, anyway).

There is much more non-contest activity on PSK31 than on RTTY.  Just tune 
between 14070 and 17072 kHz on a weekday afternoon and then go watch between 
14080 and 14095 kHz.  You can almost never find an RTTY conversation on 40m in 
the evenings, while you will see many PSK31 transmissions, from pretty much all 
over the world.

If there are any maladjustments of your transmitter, it is very obvious.  Most 
PSK31 programs even come with something for others to report your transmitter 
distortion (IMD) and the other stations can give you a very good indication of 
any problem.

PSK31 allows use of both upper and lower case characters (and indeed, full 
European character sets, and a couple of programs (two that I know) even 
support double-byte Kanji).  Your text comes out natural looking instead of 
something that comes out looking like it is from... ahhhhhh... a teleprinter.

On the other hand, if your interest is in DX chasing, then RTTY is the 
preferred mode since most DXpeditions still run RTTY for their digital mode 
operation.  But for friendly day-to-day, keyboard-to-keyboard chats, PSK31 is 
much more common on the bands.

PSK31 transmission only occupies a 50 Hz sliver of the band.  An RTTY signal 
require 7 times as much footprint. (Most RTTY signals require a separation of 8 
to 10 times more, actually).

73
Chen, W7AY







_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>