RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] WPX from GU0SUP

To: "'Tom Osborne'" <w7why@frontier.com>, "'RTTY'" <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] WPX from GU0SUP
From: "James C. Hall, MD" <heartdoc@nwtcc.com>
Date: Mon, 14 Feb 2011 15:45:09 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Oh gosh, just think of what scores we would have if everybody shortened
their macros (or create them !!!) HA !  :)

73, Jamie
WB4YDL

-----Original Message-----
From: rtty-bounces@contesting.com [mailto:rtty-bounces@contesting.com] On
Behalf Of Tom Osborne
Sent: Monday, February 14, 2011 2:56 PM
To: RTTY
Subject: Re: [RTTY] WPX from GU0SUP

Phil said:

> Just a couple of moans:
> Firstly, folk calling me when I am in the middle of a contest exchange!
> SP6NVK tried this more than a few times, and it really bugged me. It was 
> the
> cause of numerous repeats between me and the station I was working.
> And why do some folk send the serial number just once when there is 
> QRM/QSB
> and they need my CALL AGN AGN?? You really need to change your macros on 
> the

> fly depending on conditions!


Yes, and when I send QRZ? or AGN? when I don't get their callsign the first 
time, don't send my call, just yours.  Invariably, my call comes through 
perfect and theirs is garbled.  As many have said before "I know my call, I 
need yours."  Make a buffer with JUST your call in it.

Same with the exchange, the 599 is not needed in the repeat of the number 
(unless the number is 599 :-)  73
Tom W7WHY


_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

-- 
This message has been scanned for viruses and
dangerous content by MailScanner, and is
believed to be clean.

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>