RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] QSO opinion

To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] QSO opinion
From: W0MU Mike Fatchett <w0mu@w0mu.com>
Date: Thu, 13 Oct 2011 16:12:23 -0600
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
Were you given credit for it?  I was under the impression CQ did a 
fairly extensive cross check on zones.

Mike W0MU

J6/W0MU November 21 - December 1 2011 CQ WW DX CW
W0MU-1 CC Cluster w0mu.net


On 10/13/2011 12:56 PM, Bill Turner wrote:
> I've had similar qualms about CQ zones on occasion. I have received zone
> numbers that I knew were wrong - sometimes way wrong - and was not sure
> what to do. I ended up logging them but I did feel guilty about getting
> a rare multiplier I didn't really deserve. As I recall this happened
> most offten with Eastern Russia stations. Still haven't resolved what to
> do.
>
> 73, Bill W6WRT
>
>
> On 10/13/2011 8:18 AM, Phil Sussman wrote:
>> <snip>
>>
>> Here's my point: If a station in a contest is not where he claims to be
>> does that not disqualify (from everyone's log) every single QSO claim
>> when that is discovered? Of course. (Likewise the pirate, et. cetera, ad
>> nasium.)
>>
>> -End of soap box opinion
>>
>> 73 de Phil - N8PS
>>
>>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> RTTY mailing list
>> RTTY@contesting.com
>> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
>>
> _______________________________________________
> RTTY mailing list
> RTTY@contesting.com
> http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>