Actually, John, I made a poor choice of subject line. My tongue in
cheek reference to "no CW/SSB" was simply admiration of the good
treatment of the RTTY community. I was just reporting that I could
print HK0NA operating RTTY on 20, 17 and 15 meters concurrently, not to
mention that they were posted on 10 meter RTTY at the same time.
Stellar job by the Malpelo boys.
73, Dave, K2YG
> Message: 2
> Date: Sun, 5 Feb 2012 00:56:37 -0000
> From: "ko1h"<ko1h@cox.net>
> Subject: [RTTY] HK0NA - is there no SSB/CW
> To:<rtty@contesting.com>
> Message-ID:<003e01cce3a1$04052e70$0708a8c0@johna32bbea6d0>
> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1";
> reply-type=original
>
>
> Well it must be my fault. On Thursday I they were spotted on 30m cw. So I
> posted a spot that in essance said 10140 hk0na rttypse
>
> Not a few hours later they were on rtty all over the place.
>
> As stated later in this thread I noticed when I haddnt work them yet on rtty
> that they had almost 50k ssb q's 40k cw q's and not quite 3k rtty q's this
> was early last week.
>
> Perhaps there was a plan....
>
> Great Dxpedition
> de John ko1h
>
>
>
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2012 16:09:25 -0500
> From: Dave Barr<recordupe@verizon.net>
> Subject: [RTTY] HK0NA - is there no SSB/CW
> To: rtty@contesting.com
> Message-ID:<4F2C4D05.3020406@verizon.net>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
>
> At 2100z Friday (2/3) HK0NA was running RTTY on 14080, 18100.1, and
> 21081.6 simultaneously. Is this a first ever for a dxpedition? Is
> someone running SO3R, or are they just trying the ultimate "spead-out"?
>
> Kudos! I can't complain with 2 qrp qsos.
>
> 73, Dave, K2YG
>
>
>
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|