RTTY
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question)

To: <rtty@contesting.com>
Subject: Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question)
From: "Larry" <lknain@nc.rr.com>
Reply-to: Larry <w6nws@arrl.net>
Date: Wed, 27 Jun 2012 14:53:54 -0400
List-post: <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com>
I didn't do a contest in PSK from XV but in just DX with a "call 599 call" 
kind of QSO what I usually got back in PSK was "Thanks for calling. Report: 
599........". RTTY folks understand that short format QSO. PSK folks either 
do not understand the short format or perhaps are just not setup for the 
short format.

73, Larry  W6NWS

-----Original Message----- 
From: Bill Turner
Sent: Wednesday, June 27, 2012 2:33 PM
To: rtty@contesting.com
Subject: Re: [RTTY] PSK31 is faster (Was FD RTTY Question)

Isn't the "real" objection to PSK that is prone to garbling due to
multipath? It might be ok for a domestic contest like Field Day, but how
about a DX contest?

I don't use PSK all that much, but that is what I hear. True or not?

73, Bill W6WRT





On 6/27/2012 6:02 AM, aflowers@frontiernet.net wrote:
> Apologies for the provocative title, but the lamenting of PSK31's 
> perceived slowness during the FD festivities prompted me to crunch some 
> actual numbers.

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty 

_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>