I am wondering why some people are using this software when Windows
has built in timekeeping.
The Windows synchronization function was broken in many versions of
Windows and the default configuration is not adequate to maintain
the accuracy required for JT65 or many EME operations.
I've found time-sync (http://www.speed-soft.de/) to be far better and
more reliable in Vista, Windows 7 and Windows 8 than either Dimension
4 or Windows' own built-in synchronization functions.
73,
... Joe, W4TV
On 2/13/2013 7:48 PM, Lee Roberts wrote:
Ktfrog007@aol.com wrote ..
I began using Dimension4 when I started operating JT65-HF last July. It
keeps my computer accurate to within a tiny fraction of a second.
73,
Kermit, AB1J
I am wondering why some people are using this software when Windows has built
in timekeeping.
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
_______________________________________________
RTTY mailing list
RTTY@contesting.com
http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty
|