| To: | RTTY <rtty@contesting.com> |
|---|---|
| Subject: | [RTTY] Question... |
| From: | David Cole <dave@nk7z.net> |
| Reply-to: | dave@nk7z.net |
| Date: | Sun, 28 Jul 2013 04:19:41 -0700 |
| List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Could someone explain to me how switching from a mode based enforcement rule base to a bandwidth enforced method will increase the commercial use of ham radio? I am not seeing it... -- Thanks and 73's, For equipment, and software setups and reviews see: www.nk7z.net for MixW support see; http://groups.yahoo.com/group/mixw/ for Dopplergram information see: http://groups.yahoo.com/group/dopplergram/ _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
| <Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
|---|---|---|
| ||
| Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL issues Official Reply: Re 2.8KHz HF digital BW, Jeff Blaine |
|---|---|
| Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL issues Official Reply: Re 2.8KHz HF digital BW, Joe Subich, W4TV |
| Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] RTTY Digest, Vol 127, Issue 32, Ben Antanaitis - WB2RHM |
| Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Question..., Joe Subich, W4TV |
| Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |