To: | rtty@contesting.com |
---|---|
Subject: | Re: [RTTY] Question... |
From: | Ktfrog007@aol.com |
Date: | Sun, 28 Jul 2013 09:56:34 -0400 (EDT) |
List-post: | <rtty@contesting.com">mailto:rtty@contesting.com> |
Thanks, Joe, for the nice, concise explanation of this issue. 73, Ken, AB1J In a message dated 2013-07-28 12:19:00 Coordinated Universal Time, lists@subich.com writes: Mode based enforcement essentially limits data throughput. Most commercial users are not interested in channels with throughput below a few 10's of kb/s. Providing 2.8 KHz of bandwidth will allow throughput of around 56k with compression. That becomes very interesting for non-priority use. 73, ... Joe, W4TV _______________________________________________ RTTY mailing list RTTY@contesting.com http://lists.contesting.com/mailman/listinfo/rtty |
<Prev in Thread] | Current Thread | [Next in Thread> |
---|---|---|
|
Previous by Date: | Re: [RTTY] Question..., Joe Subich, W4TV |
---|---|
Next by Date: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL issues Official Reply: Re 2.8KHz HF digital, BW, iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato |
Previous by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] Question..., Bill Turner |
Next by Thread: | Re: [RTTY] ARRL issues Official Reply: Re 2.8KHz HF digital, BW, iw1ayd - Salvatore Irato |
Indexes: | [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists] |